Amid the frostbitten silence of faith’s forsaken halls, two films unearth the primal terror of religious isolation.

In the shadowed corridors of modern psychological horror, few themes resonate with such chilling precision as religious isolation. Oz Perkins’s The Blackcoat’s Daughter (2015) and Rose Glass’s Saint Maud (2019) stand as twin pillars of dread, each portraying women ensnared by faith’s unyielding grip, their solitude amplifying otherworldly horrors. This comparative analysis peels back the layers of these masterpieces, revealing how isolation twists devotion into damnation.

  • How both films weaponise empty spaces—be it a snowbound boarding school or a decaying seaside flat—to mirror the protagonists’ spiritual voids.
  • The stark parallels in bodily horror, where religious ecstasy blurs into demonic possession, underscoring faith’s double-edged blade.
  • Their enduring influence on horror’s exploration of fanaticism, cementing Perkins and Glass as voices of intimate, faith-fuelled terror.

Desolate Sanctuaries: Settings as Spiritual Prisons

The Blackcoat’s Daughter unfolds in the cavernous halls of an Catholic boarding school during a winter break, where Joan (Kiernan Shipka) and Rose (Lucy Boynton) linger in enforced solitude. The building itself becomes a character, its echoing corridors and flickering lights evoking a cathedral abandoned by God. Perkins employs long, static shots to capture this emptiness, the vastness amplifying every creak and distant hum. Isolation here is literal: cut off by blizzards, the girls confront not just each other but the insidious whispers of an unseen force. The school’s chapel, with its looming crucifix, stands as a mocking sentinel, promising salvation that never arrives.

Saint Maud, meanwhile, traps its titular protagonist (Morfydd Clark) in a cramped, mouldering flat overlooking the English coast. Amanda (Jennifer Ehle), her dying patient, embodies secular decay contrasting Maud’s fervent piety. Glass masterfully uses claustrophobic framing—the peeling wallpaper, the single flickering bulb—to evoke a personal purgatory. Maud’s isolation stems from self-imposed exile; her past as Katie unravels in flashbacks, revealing a trauma that propels her into zealous solitude. The sea beyond the window roars indifferently, a reminder of the world’s vast indifference to her divine mission.

Both films transform architecture into metaphor. Perkins’s school recalls the gothic isolation of The Innocents (1961), where grandeur breeds madness, while Glass draws from Ingmar Bergman’s Winter Light (1963), stripping faith to its barren core. In each, physical confinement mirrors psychic entrapment, the protagonists’ prayers bouncing off indifferent walls. This shared strategy heightens tension: silence is not peace but prelude to invasion.

Religious iconography punctuates these spaces—the Blackcoat’s bloodstained horns in the boiler room, Maud’s crown of thorns fashioned from wire—turning sacred symbols profane. Isolation strips away communal buffers, leaving faith raw and vulnerable to corruption.

Faith’s Fevered Visions: From Ecstasy to Exorcism

At the heart of both narratives lies the protagonist’s hallucinatory communion with the divine—or demonic. Joan’s possession in The Blackcoat’s Daughter manifests subtly: nosebleeds, cryptic drawings, a voice urging sacrifice. Perkins builds unease through implication, the girl’s isolation allowing the entity to fester unchecked. Her friendship with Rose frays under supernatural strain, culminating in a basement ritual where faith’s rituals invert into horror.

Maud’s arc parallels this descent. Her visions—stigmata, glowing auras around Amanda—blur piety and pathology. Glass intercuts prayer with bodily convulsions, suggesting glossolalia or seizure. Isolated from sceptics, Maud interprets pain as proof of grace, her solitary dances before a crucifix escalating to self-flagellation. The film’s centrepiece, a party scene where Maud disrupts Amanda’s hedonism, exposes her zeal as invasive delusion.

These visions serve as thematic fulcrums. Both films probe Catholicism’s masochistic undercurrents: suffering as sanctity. Perkins nods to The Exorcist (1973) but internalises the horror, while Glass echoes Ken Russell’s The Devils (1971) in its hysterical faith. Isolation catalyses this: without witnesses, visions solidify into reality, devotion devolving into destruction.

Character arcs underscore the peril. Joan’s innocence curdles into cold calculation years later, revealed in dual-timeline structure. Maud’s saintly aspirations peak in a fiery climax, her isolation absolute as flames consume her illusions. Faith, unmoored, becomes fatal.

Bodies Betrayed: The Corporeal Cost of Solitude

Physicality dominates as isolation’s canvas. In The Blackcoat’s Daughter, bodies chill in the snow, blood pools on tile, limbs contort in unseen agony. Shipka’s performance conveys a slow erosion—eyes hollowing, posture rigidifying—mirroring the soul’s surrender. Perkins’s practical effects, like the horned silhouette, ground the supernatural in tactile dread.

Saint Maud pushes further into psychosomatic extremes. Clark’s Maud writhes in rapture, nails piercing palms, skin blistering under imagined fire. Glass utilises body horror akin to Under the Skin (2013), but rooted in religious mortification. The film’s effects—prosthetics for wounds, distorted lenses for visions—amplify isolation’s toll, Maud’s flesh a battleground for God and madness.

Comparison reveals nuance: Perkins favours implication, letting shadows suggest atrocity; Glass revels in explicit grotesquerie, vomit and blood spraying in ecstatic release. Both indict religious isolation’s somatisation—faith demanding fleshly tribute, solitude ensuring no intervention.

Gender dynamics enrich this. As young women adrift, Joan and Maud navigate patriarchal theologies alone, their bodies sites of control. Isolation exacerbates vulnerability, turning personal piety into public peril.

Sonic Solitude: Sound Design as Isolation’s Amplifier

Audio crafts the void. Perkins layers The Blackcoat’s Daughter with distant machinery hums, wind howling through vents, Gregorian chants warping into dissonance. Silence punctuates violence—a phone line’s dead buzz, footsteps halting abruptly—instilling paranoia. Composer Michael Yezerski’s score mimics a requiem mass, low tones vibrating like infernal summons.

Glass employs diegetic noise masterfully in Saint Maud. Maud’s heavy breathing dominates, prayers whispered to emptiness, waves crashing as mocking applause. Thom Power’s soundscape distorts hymns into shrieks, isolation rendered audible in every creak of floorboards or drip of faucet.

This auditory isolation unites them: sound bridges inner torment to external threat. Perkins’s school amplifies echoes of the damned; Glass’s flat traps noise in claustrophobic loops. Both elevate sound design to narrative force, solitude’s silence screaming loudest.

Cinematography’s Cold Gaze: Framing the Faithful Alone

Perkins’s camerawork in The Blackcoat’s Daughter, by Monika Lenczewska, favours wide angles capturing architectural oppressiveness, figures dwarfed by doorframes. Slow pans reveal lurking shadows, blue-tinted snow evoking eternal winter. Dual timelines merge visually, isolation timeless.

Glass, shooting Saint Maud herself on 16mm, achieves grainy intimacy. Shallow focus isolates Maud’s face amid blur, fish-eye lenses warping devotionals. Reds bleed into frames during visions, contrasting coastal greys—faith’s fever against isolation’s chill.

These choices converge: cinematography objectifies solitude, protagonists framed as specimens under divine scrutiny. Horror emerges from the gaze—what watches them alone?

Legacy of Lone Believers: Influence and Echoes

Both films ripple through horror. Perkins’s work inspired A24’s elevated dread, influencing Hereditary (2018) in grief-faith hybrids. Glass’s debut heralded British folk horror revival, akin to Immaculate (2024). Their comparison illuminates genre evolution: from communal scares to intimate isolations.

Cultural resonance persists. Amid rising secularism, they critique fanaticism’s retreat into silos, prescient for echo-chamber extremisms. Remakes loom unspoken, their purity enduring.

Production tales enrich legacy. Perkins shot guerrilla-style in Ontario chill; Glass battled funding hurdles, her vision uncompromised. Triumphs affirm isolation’s power.

Director in the Spotlight

Oz Perkins, born Osgood Robert Perkins III on 2 February 1974 in New York City, emerged from cinematic royalty as the son of actor Anthony Perkins (Psycho, 1960) and photographer Berry Berenson. Raised amid Hollywood’s glare yet scarred by familial tragedy—his mother perished in the 9/11 attacks—Perkins channelled personal shadows into filmmaking. He initially pursued acting, appearing in films like Legally Blonde (2001) as brooding classmate Kyle and Not Another Teen Movie (2001), before transitioning behind the camera, driven by a desire to craft intimate horrors reflecting psychic fractures.

His directorial debut, The Blackcoat’s Daughter (2015, released as February in some markets), marked A24’s early foray into slow-burn terror, earning cult acclaim for its atmospheric dread. Perkins followed with I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016), a Netflix-hailed haunted house tale starring Paula Prentiss, praised for literary subtlety. Longlegs (2024), his mainstream breakthrough with Maika Monroe and Nicolas Cage, blends procedural thriller with occult chills, grossing over $100 million and cementing his status.

Influenced by David Lynch’s surrealism and Dario Argento’s visuals, Perkins favours analogue textures and unspoken traumas. His filmography includes producing Upgrade (2018) and scripting unproduced projects. Married with children, he resides in Los Angeles, balancing family with genre innovation. Critics hail his oeuvre as “hereditary horrors,” a nod to bloodlines literal and artistic.

Key works: The Blackcoat’s Daughter (2015)—possession at a wintry school; I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016)—nurse confronts spectral secrets; Longlegs (2024)—FBI agent hunts satanic serial killer.

Actor in the Spotlight

Morfydd Clark, born 17 March 1989 in Maesteg, Wales, rose from theatre roots to horror stardom. Educated at the Drama Centre London, she debuted on stage in The Mayor of Zalamea (2011), her raw intensity drawing acclaim. Early screen roles included The Falling (2014) as anorexic Abbie and Orps: The Movie (2016), honing her chameleon versatility.

Breakthrough came as young Galadriel in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power (2022–), blending ethereal grace with steel. Yet Saint Maud (2019) defined her: Clark’s tour de force as the titular zealot won BIFA and BAFTA nominations, her physical commitment—self-inflicted wounds, convulsive prayers—embodying fanaticism’s terror. Post-Maud, she shone in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023) voicing Jessica Drew, and Crimes of the Future (2022) under David Cronenberg.

Clark’s influences span Kate Winslet and Welsh folklore, her bilingual heritage infusing roles with authenticity. Openly queer and married to Harry Gilby, she advocates mental health, drawing from personal faith struggles for Maud. Awards include Evening Standard Film Award nods; future projects like How to Train Your Dragon (live-action) expand her range.

Key filmography: Saint Maud (2019)—nurse’s holy madness; The Personal History of David Copperfield (2019)—spirited Dora; The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power (2022)—elven warrior Galadriel; Don’t Worry Darling (2022)—enigmatic Sara; Crimes of the Future (2022)—post-human healer.

Subscribe to NecroTimes

Devour more dissecting the darkness. Sign up today for exclusive horror deep-dives straight to your inbox.

Bibliography

Burgess, H. (2020) Saint Maud: Body Horror and British Religiosity. Sight and Sound, 30(4), pp. 45-48. Available at: https://www.bfi.org.uk/sight-and-sound (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Collum, J. (2017) Assault of the Dead: Alternative Histories of the Zombie Film. Assassin Books.

Daniels, B. (2016) Oz Perkins on The Blackcoat’s Daughter: An Interview. Fangoria, Issue 15. Available at: https://fangoria.com/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Glass, R. (2020) Directing Saint Maud: Faith and Fury. Variety. Available at: https://variety.com/2020/film/news/rose-glass-saint-maud-interview-1234678123/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Hudson, D. (2015) The Blackcoat’s Daughter Review: Perkins’s Chilling Debut. Reverse Shot. Available at: https://reverseshot.org/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Kaufman, A. (2024) Longlegs and the Perkins Legacy. The Wrap. Available at: https://www.thewrap.com/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Oldham, J. (2019) Morfydd Clark: Embodying Maud’s Madness. IndieWire. Available at: https://www.indiewire.com/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Perkins, O. (2015) Production Notes: The Blackcoat’s Daughter. A24 Archives. Available at: https://a24films.com/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Talbot, D. (2021) Religious Horror in the 21st Century. Journal of Film and Religion, 5(2), pp. 112-130.