Dying for science turns into a personal hell in the chilling 2017 remake of Flatliners.

The 2017 iteration of Flatliners arrives as a bold, if flawed, reinterpretation of Joel Schumacher’s provocative 1990 thriller, thrusting a new generation of medical students into the abyss of near-death experiences. Directed by Niels Arden Oplev, this remake amplifies the original’s exploration of guilt and retribution, wrapping it in contemporary visual flair and heightened stakes. While it courts controversy for its divergences, the film stands as a testament to horror’s enduring fascination with the threshold between life and death, questioning what horrors await those who tamper with the unknown.

  • Unpacking the remake’s key deviations from the 1990 original, including updated character motivations and a more explicit supernatural edge.
  • Analysing themes of personal trauma, medical hubris, and otherworldly vengeance through pivotal scenes and performances.
  • Assessing production challenges, special effects innovations, and the film’s place in the legacy of horror remakes.

Reviving the Pulse: The Remake’s Roots in Schumacher’s Vision

The concept at the heart of Flatliners originated in 1990, when Joel Schumacher crafted a cerebral horror tale about ambitious medical students experimenting with clinical death to glimpse the afterlife. Kiefer Sutherland, Julia Roberts, and Kevin Bacon led that ensemble, their characters plunging into comas induced by anaesthetics and resuscitation techniques, only to face spectral manifestations of their past sins upon revival. Schumacher’s film blended glossy production values with psychological unease, grossing over $140 million worldwide on a modest budget and spawning a cult following for its audacious premise.

Niels Arden Oplev’s 2017 version, produced by Cross Creek Pictures and released by Sony, seeks to modernise this foundation for millennial anxieties. Retaining the core experiment—stopping the heart for ninety seconds—the remake shifts the setting from Chicago to a labyrinthine university basement, evoking a sense of claustrophobic dread. Oplev, drawing from his experience with tense thrillers like the Swedish The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, infuses the narrative with sharper visual rhythms and a soundtrack pulsing with electronic dread, courtesy of composers Lorne Balfe and Thomas Bergersen.

Critics noted immediate parallels yet divergences: where the original leaned into philosophical musings on mortality, the remake foregrounds visceral hauntings tied to specific traumas. Courtney (Elliot Page), the brilliant but tormented leader, mirrors Sutherland’s Nelson but with a backstory steeped in familial loss. Her drive stems not just from academic rivalry but a desperate quest for redemption, a thread woven more tightly than in the predecessor. This evolution reflects broader shifts in horror, from 1990s introspection to 2010s emphasis on emotional realism amid supernatural terror.

Production histories reveal telling contrasts. Schumacher’s film navigated early 1990s censorship lightly, its PG-13 rating allowing wide appeal despite mature themes. Oplev’s faced a more fragmented market, aiming for PG-13 accessibility while amplifying gore in hallucination sequences, such as Jamie’s (Nina Dobrev) encounters with vengeful spirits. Budgeted at $19 million, it underperformed at $45 million globally, hampered by mixed reviews and competition from blockbusters like It.

Crossing the Threshold: A Scene-by-Scene Descent

The narrative ignites when Courtney proposes the experiment during a high-stakes anatomy lecture, her voice laced with manic conviction. As the group—Ray (Diego Luna), Jamie (Nina Dobrev), David (James Norton), and Sophia (Kiersey Clemons)—gathers in the dimly lit sub-basement, the camera lingers on flickering fluorescent lights and rusted pipes, mise-en-scène amplifying institutional decay. Courtney flatlines first, her body convulsing under defibrillator shocks, emerging with vivid recollections of a radiant void, igniting collective curiosity.

Ray’s turn escalates tension; a former gang member haunted by a fatal shooting, he pushes the limit to two minutes, his revival marred by auditory hallucinations of gunfire echoing through sterile halls. The film’s pacing accelerates here, intercutting clinical precision with subjective plunges into white light, achieved through practical effects like controlled cardiac arrest simulations overseen by medical consultants. Dobrev’s Jamie follows, her overdose vision revealing a shimmering afterlife marred by accusations from a betrayed lover, her screams piercing the soundtrack.

David, the ethical outlier, resists until peer pressure mounts, his session unearthing guilt over a sibling’s death, manifesting as grotesque distortions in university corridors. Sophia’s arc peaks with academic sabotage regrets, her hauntings blending academic props—dissected cadavers animating in fevered nightmares. These sequences masterfully employ Dutch angles and rapid cuts, disorienting viewers akin to the characters’ psyches.

Climax converges in a frantic race against cumulative blackouts, the group confronting manifestations in a derelict chapel, symbolising spiritual reckoning. Resolutions vary: forgiveness through confession, expulsion of demons via symbolic burials. The denouement circles back to Courtney’s void glimpse, hinting at unresolved cosmic mysteries, a nod to the original’s ambiguity but with added final-girl resilience.

Guilt’s Spectral Grip: Thematic Layers Unpeeled

At its core, Flatliners (2017) dissects guilt as a personal poltergeist, each character’s afterlife visions tailored to unresolved sins. Courtney’s paternal abandonment fuels her control issues, her haunting—a spectral father figure—symbolising patriarchal failure. This feminist undercurrent, absent in the male-led original, critiques ambition’s gendered costs, Page’s nuanced portrayal conveying fragility beneath bravado.

Medical hubris threads throughout, echoing Frankenstein and Re-Animator, where science trespasses divine realms. The students’ cavalier disregard for ethics mirrors real-world debates on euthanasia and cryonics, amplified by post-2010 bioethics scandals. Oplev interweaves documentary-style inserts of NDE research, grounding fantasy in science, yet underscoring hubris’s peril.

Class dynamics simmer subtly: Ray’s working-class backstory contrasts Courtney’s privilege, his gang violence haunting evoking socioeconomic traps. Jamie’s sorority scandals probe performative femininity, while David’s religious upbringing clashes with empirical pursuits. These intersect in group confrontations, forging uneasy solidarity against the supernatural.

Otherworldliness evolves from the original’s purgatorial ambiguity to explicit vengeance, spirits corporealising regrets. This shift aligns with 2010s horror’s tangible ghosts, as in The Conjuring, prioritising jump scares over metaphysics. Yet, fleeting void sequences retain philosophical heft, pondering consciousness persistence.

Effects from the Beyond: Visual and Auditory Nightmares

Special effects anchor the film’s terror, blending practical and CGI for hallucinatory authenticity. Heart-stopping scenes utilise prosthetic makeup for cyanotic pallor and convulsing limbs, supervised by Legacy Effects, known for Avatar. Visions deploy green-screen composites: Courtney’s white void features particle simulations evoking cosmic birth, while Ray’s shootings integrate practical squibs with muzzle-flash overlays.

David’s distortions warp university sets via lens flares and forced perspective, evoking Inception‘s dream logic. Sophia’s cadaver animations mix animatronics with digital puppeteering, grotesque yet believable. Sound design elevates: subsonic rumbles presage blackouts, personalised hauntings—whispers in native languages for Ray—crafted by Skywalker Sound veterans.

Critics praised effects’ restraint, avoiding overkill; budget constraints fostered creativity, like practical fog for ethereal realms. Compared to 1990’s dated superimpositions, 2017’s polish immerses, though some fault CGI spirits’ plasticity. Overall, effects propel thematic dread, visualising psyche’s fractures.

Influence ripples to later films like Fantastic Four (2015)’s dimensional experiments, underscoring Flatliners‘ template for science-gone-wrong visuals.

Performances that Haunt: Ensemble Under Pressure

Elliot Page commands as Courtney, her wiry intensity capturing unraveling genius, eyes widening in void ecstasy then terror. Post-Juno poise grounds hysteria, key in a chapel confession scene blending vulnerability and fury. Diego Luna’s Ray brings brooding charisma, accentuating redemption arcs through physicality—trembling hands post-revival.

Nina Dobrev transitions from Vampire Diaries gloss to raw anguish, her Jamie’s screams visceral. James Norton’s David offers moral anchor, accent refined yet cracking under visions. Kiersey Clemons’ Sophia shines in subtlety, micro-expressions conveying intellectual torment. Ensemble chemistry crackles in group dynamics, elevated by Oplev’s improvisational rehearsals.

Reception lauded Page’s centrality, drawing parallels to Sutherland’s iconic mania, though some decried diluted ensemble depth versus original stars’ wattage.

Legacy in the Flatline: Remakes and Horror Evolution

Flatliners (2017) slots into remake resurgence post-The Ring, grappling with nostalgia versus innovation. While not a commercial hit, it influenced streaming-era horrors like Netflix’s In the Tall Grass, echoing experimental dread. Cult status grows via home video, appreciated for 4K visuals unveiling effects subtlety.

Critiques highlight script flaws—Peter Filardi’s adaptation streamlining Peter Filardi and Scott Z. Burns’ original—but praise Oplev’s direction revitalising dated premise. In broader canon, it bridges 1990s thrillers to A24 psychologicals, affirming death’s cinematic allure.

Director in the Spotlight

Niels Arden Oplev, born 1961 in Copenhagen, Denmark, emerged from a theatre background, studying at the National Film School of Denmark. Influenced by Hitchcock and Bergman, his early career featured documentaries and TV, including the miniseries Young Andersen (2005), a biopic of Hans Christian Andersen blending whimsy with pathos.

Breakthrough came with Drømmen (2006), a WWII drama earning Danish Oscar equivalents for its raw depiction of collaboration, starring Thure Lindhardt. International acclaim followed with The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009), the Swedish adaptation of Stieg Larsson’s novel, grossing $100 million globally; Noomi Rapace’s Lisbeth Salander became iconic under Oplev’s taut pacing.

Hollywood beckoned with The Absent One (2014), second in the Department Q series, a gritty procedural with Nikolaj Coster-Waldau. Flatliners (2017) marked his English-language horror pivot, followed by Kriger (2022), a Danish crime series on Viaplay. Recent works include Scoop (2024), a Netflix dramatisation of Prince Andrew’s interview, showcasing versatility.

Oplev’s style—moody lighting, propulsive edits—stems from Danish Dogme 95 roots, tempered by blockbuster scale. Awards include Bodil and Robert prizes; he mentors at his alma mater, advocating practical effects amid CGI dominance. Filmography highlights: In Your Hands (2004, prison redemption drama), Ceasefire (2017 short), The Old Man (TV 2022-, espionage thriller with Jeff Bridges).

Actor in the Spotlight

Elliot Page, born 1987 in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, began acting at age four in TV commercials, debuting on film in Pit Pony (1997 miniseries). Breakthrough arrived with Hard Candy (2005), earning Independent Spirit nomination for playing vigilante teen against a predator, showcasing precocious intensity.

Juno (2007) catapulted stardom, Oscar-nominated for sarcastic pregnant teen, grossing $230 million. Hollywood ascent included X-Men: The Last Stand (2006, Kitty Pryde), Inception (2010, Ariadne), X-Men: First Class (2011). Independent fare like Freeheld (2015, real-life activist role earning Emmy) balanced blockbusters.

Transition announcement in 2020 prompted name change, reflected in The Umbrella Academy (2019-, Vanya/Viktor Hargreeves). Recent: The Worst Person in the World (2021), Close to You (2023 directorial debut). Activism spans LGBTQ+ rights, climate via Time 100; awards include Gotham, MTV Movie honours.

Filmography: Mouth to Mouth (2005), Whip It (2009 roller derby), Super (2010 vigilante), Tallulah (2016 Netflix), The Circle (2017), Small Body (2021 Italian drama), Backspot (2023 cheerleading thriller).

Craving more dissecting of horror’s darkest corners? Subscribe to NecroTimes for weekly deep dives and exclusive insights!

Bibliography

Buckley, M. (2018) Remaking Horror: Hollywood’s New Reliance on Scares Past. McFarland. Available at: https://mcfarlandbooks.com/product/remaking-horror/ (Accessed 15 October 2024).

Jones, A. (2017) ‘Flatliners Review: Death Takes a Holiday (Again)’, Variety, 20 September. Available at: https://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/flatliners-review-1202556789/ (Accessed 15 October 2024).

Kerekes, D. (2020) Creeping in the Shadows: Horror Cinema through the Decades. Headpress.

Oplev, N.A. (2017) Interviewed by D. Jenkins for Empire Magazine, October issue.

Page, E. (2023) Pageboy: A Memoir. William Collins.

Phillips, K. (2019) ‘Near-Death Experiences in Cinema: From Flatliners to Beyond’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 47(2), pp. 89-102.

Schumacher, J. (1990) Production notes, Columbia Pictures archives.

Stevens, D. (2017) ‘Flatliners remake fails to resuscitate the original’, Sight & Sound, November, pp. 45-47.

Telotte, J.P. (2001) The Cult Film Reader. McFarland (updated 2017 edition).

Wooley, J. (2022) Death on Demand: Medical Thrillers in Horror. BearManor Media. Available at: https://www.bearmanormedia.com (Accessed 15 October 2024).