Echoes That Haunt: Dissecting Curses in The Ring, Smile, and It Follows

In the dim glow of a cursed videotape, a grotesque grin, or a slow-walking shadow, three films redefine the inescapable dread of supernatural affliction.

Curse horror thrives on the primal fear of inevitability, where malevolent forces latch onto the victim with unyielding persistence. Films like Gore Verbinski’s The Ring (2002), Parker Finn’s Smile (2022), and David Robert Mitchell’s It Follows (2014) master this subgenre by transforming everyday acts into vectors of doom. Each presents a contagion that defies escape, mirroring contemporary anxieties from viral media to interpersonal trauma. This analysis peels back their layers to reveal how they innovate on ancient folklore while amplifying modern unease.

  • The Ring establishes the template with its technological curse, blending analogue horror and investigative dread.
  • Smile evolves the formula through psychological contagion, tying grins to inherited madness.
  • It Follows strips horror to its essence via sexual transmission and relentless pursuit, redefining spatial terror.

The Tape That Binds: Origins in The Ring

In The Ring, the curse manifests through a grainy VHS tape, a relic of pre-digital analogue terror that Verbinski updates from Hideo Nakata’s Ringu (1998). Rachel Keller, played with quiet intensity by Naomi Watts, uncovers the tape’s lethal secret after her niece dies seven days post-viewing. The film’s power lies in its methodical escalation: cryptic images of wells, ladders, and maggots build a puzzle that demands solving, yet solving it only propagates the plague. This investigative structure echoes classic ghost stories like those in M.R. James, where knowledge invites doom.

Verbinski’s direction emphasises isolation amid urban sprawl. Rachel’s Seattle ferry rides and rain-slicked drives underscore her solitude, much like the well-trapped Sadako’s rage. The tape’s visuals, crafted with practical effects by Rick Baker’s team, evoke a fever dream: a fly crawling from a television screen symbolises invasion into reality. Sound design amplifies this, with T.J. Loth’s score layering dissonant strings over static bursts, creating a soundscape that lingers like tinnitus.

What sets The Ring apart in curse horror is its duality of empathy and horror. Sadako emerges not as mindless evil but a vengeful spirit wronged by medical experiments, her crawl from the TV a grotesque rebirth. This humanises the curse, prompting viewers to question complicity in passing it on. Rachel’s choice to copy the tape for her son Aidan cements the moral quandary: survival demands victimising another.

Grins from the Grave: Smile’s Inherited Madness

Parker Finn’s Smile shifts the curse to a visual cue: witnessing a suicide accompanied by an unnatural rictus grin transfers the affliction. Therapist Rose Cotter (Sosie Bacon) spirals after seeing a patient self-immolate, her scepticism crumbling under escalating hallucinations. Finn draws from urban legends of smiling entities, akin to creepypasta tales, but grounds it in trauma therapy sessions that expose Rose’s buried grief over her mother’s suicide.

The film’s grin motif pervades mise-en-scène. Teeth gleam in low light, smiles distort faces in reflections, and practical makeup by Barrie Gower creates a entity with a lamprey-like maw. Cinematographer Charlie Sarroff employs Dutch angles and shallow focus to mimic paranoia, turning familiar spaces like Rose’s home into funhouse mirrors. Sound here pivots to diegetic horror: Rose’s tinnitus-like ringing precedes manifestations, a nod to real psychological dissociation.

Smile excels in generational transmission, requiring the cursed to convey their doom verbally to another before expiring in seven days. This oral tradition evokes folktales like the Hook Hand legend, but Finn infuses class commentary: Rose’s upward mobility clashes with her working-class roots, the curse punishing denial of heritage. Bacon’s performance anchors this, her wide-eyed terror evolving into feral desperation, culminating in a basement ritual that flips victimhood.

Unlike its predecessors, Smile leans into body horror, with the entity’s manifestations ripping through human forms in gory tableaus. A professor’s decapitation by weight plates or a teammate’s bathroom evisceration use squib effects masterfully, heightening the curse’s physicality. Yet Finn balances gore with restraint, letting implication fester.

Steps in the Distance: It Follows’ Relentless Shadow

David Robert Mitchell’s It Follows innovates with a sexually transmitted curse: post-coitus, the victim is pursued by a shape-shifting entity that walks at a steady pace, killing on contact. Jay (Maika Monroe) inherits it from her hookup, her Detroit suburbs becoming a labyrinth of evasion. Mitchell strips supernatural tropes to existential minimalism, the entity visible only to the cursed, fostering doubt and isolation.

Visuals prioritise wide shots by Mike Gioulakis, capturing the entity’s inexorable advance across beaches, pools, and abandoned malls. No music swells during chases; Rich Vreeland’s synth score pulses subtly, mimicking a heartbeat under threat. This low-key dread builds spatial anxiety: the entity can mimic loved ones, turning friends into potential deceivers.

The film’s sexual mechanics provoke discourse on promiscuity myths, yet Mitchell subverts by portraying transmission as communal effort. Jay’s friends aid evasion, firing guns, wielding boats, even electrocution attempts, all futile against immortality. The lake finale symbolises baptismal failure, the entity rising anew, underscoring curses as eternal cycles.

It Follows draws from 1970s paranoia films like Halloween, but its entity embodies STD fears post-AIDS era, walking rather than sprinting to evoke inevitability. Practical effects keep it grounded: actors in varied costumes shuffle forward, heightening uncanny valley unease.

Vectors of Doom: Transmission Mechanics Compared

Each film reimagines curse spread: The Ring‘s passive viewing democratises horror via media, predating viral videos. Smile demands active witnessing, interpersonal and voyeuristic, while It Follows requires intimacy, flipping protection into peril. This progression mirrors societal shifts from broadcast to social contagion.

Time limits unify them—seven days—building countdown tension. Rachel races clues, Rose hallucinates accelerating visions, Jay maps evasion routes. Yet escape proves illusory: copying propagates, verbal passing burdens, sex dilutes but persists. Moral rot festers, questioning humanity’s selfishness.

Manifestations vary: Sadako’s watery ghost personalises rage; Smile’s entity collective, feeding on trauma; the Follower’s anonymity universalises threat. All exploit liminal spaces—TV static, grins in crowds, empty streets—for invasion.

Spectral Illusions: Special Effects and Apparitions

Practical effects dominate, grounding supernatural in tangible dread. The Ring‘s Sadako crawl used harnesses and slowed footage, her hair a latex mass hiding mechanisms. Smile employed animatronics for the entity’s jaw extension, blending with CGI sparingly for multiplicity. It Follows shunned effects entirely, relying on stunt performers for authenticity.

These choices enhance realism: viewers feel the crawl’s damp chill, the grin’s stretch, the footsteps’ thud. Lighting plays key: blue-green hues in The Ring evoke underwater tombs, harsh fluorescents in Smile psychiatric dread, suburban sodium lamps in It Follows nocturnal menace.

Influence extends to successors; The Ring birthed J-horror remakes, Smile its sequel, It Follows copycats like They Look Like People. Culturally, they permeate memes, from tape parodies to “it” jokes.

Psychological Depths: Trauma and Modernity

Thematically, curses embody unprocessed grief: Rachel’s maternal loss mirrors Sadako’s, Rose confronts suicide legacy, Jay navigates post-rape vulnerability. Gender dynamics emerge—female protagonists bear burdens, passing curses to lovers or kin, critiquing relational sacrifices.

Class threads subtly: Rachel’s journalist mobility, Rose’s professional facade, Jay’s blue-collar crew. National contexts differ: The Ring‘s Americanised J-horror tech-phobia, Smile‘s post-pandemic mental health, It Follows‘s Rust Belt decay.

Sound design unifies dread: analogue glitches, ringing tones, distant footsteps create auditory hauntings persisting post-viewing.

Legacy of Lingering Fear

These films cement curse horror’s evolution, from object-bound to relational plagues. Their restraint—slow burns over jumpscares—earns acclaim, influencing Talk to Me and Barbarian. Box office successes (The Ring grossed $249 million) prove appetite for cerebral scares.

Critics praise innovation: It Follows scored 95% on Rotten Tomatoes for metaphorical depth, Smile revitalised theatrical horror post-COVID. They endure, curses that screens cannot contain.

Director in the Spotlight

Gore Verbinski, born Gregor Justin Verbinski on 16 March 1964 in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, emerged from a family of scientists—his father Victor a physicist—fostering his analytical eye for storytelling. Raised in La Jolla, California, he honed visual skills through surfing films before studying film at UCLA. Verbinski cut teeth directing commercials for Nike and Coca-Cola, earning Clio Awards for innovative spots blending live-action and animation.

His feature debut Mouse Hunt (1997) showcased slapstick mastery with Nathan Lane and Lee Evans, grossing $122 million. The Ring (2002) propelled him to horror auteur status, adapting Ringu with atmospheric dread. Transitioning to blockbusters, Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) launched a franchise earning billions, starring Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow. Sequels Dead Man’s Chest (2006) and At World’s End (2007) followed, blending swashbuckling with supernatural lore.

Verbinski explored animation with Rango (2011), voicing the chameleon lead in a $135 million hit praised for Western parody. A Cure for Wellness (2016) returned to gothic horror, a lavish tale of alpine sanatoriums starring Dane DeHaan. A Man Called Otto (2022) pivoted to drama, remaking A Man Called Ove with Tom Hanks. Influences include David Lynch’s surrealism and Powell-Pressburger’s visuals. Upcoming projects include Big Bug Man, blending family adventure with effects wizardry. Verbinski’s career spans $4 billion in box office, marked by genre versatility and meticulous craft.

Filmography highlights: Mouse Hunt (1997, comedy); The Ring (2002, horror); Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003, adventure); Dead Man’s Chest (2006, adventure); At World’s End (2007, adventure); Rango (2011, animation); A Cure for Wellness (2016, thriller); A Man Called Otto (2022, drama).

Actor in the Spotlight

Naomi Watts, born 28 September 1968 in Shoreham, Kent, England, moved to Australia at age 14 after her father’s death, instilling resilience. Early roles in Brides of Christ (1991) miniseries led to Hollywood via David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive (2001), earning BAFTA nomination for her dual-role Betty/Diane. Watts embodies quiet intensity, rising from indie struggles to A-list.

The Ring (2002) breakthrough saw her as Rachel Keller, investigative grit propelling the film to $250 million. Oscar-nominated for 21 Grams (2003) opposite Sean Penn, she shone in King Kong (2005) as Ann Darrow, enduring motion-capture spectacle. Eastern Promises (2007) with Viggo Mortensen garnered another BAFTA nod for Anna.

Diversifying, Watts led Fair Game (2010) as Valerie Plame, earning Emmy for The Impossible (2012) tsunami survival drama. Diana (2013) portrayed Princess Diana, divisive yet committed. Television triumphs include The Loudest Voice (2019) as Gretchen Carlson, Emmy-winning. Recent: Babes (2024) comedy with Michelle Buteau.

Awards: Two Golden Globes nominations, Screen Actors Guild for Birdman ensemble (2014). Influences: Meryl Streep’s range, Kate Winslet’s rawness. Filmography: Tank Girl (1995, action); Mulholland Drive (2001, mystery); The Ring (2002, horror); 21 Grams (2003, drama); King Kong (2005, adventure); Eastern Promises (2007, thriller); The Impossible (2012, drama); Birdman (2014, comedy); Ophelia (2018, drama).

Which curse would you dread most? Share in the comments and subscribe for more NecroTimes deep dives into horror’s shadows.

Bibliography

Harper, S. (2004) Embracing the Noughties: DVD and the New Horror Audience. Scope: An Online Journal of Film and Television Studies. Available at: http://www.scope.nottingham.ac.uk/article.php?issue=jan2004&id=254 (Accessed 15 October 2024).

Heffernan, K. (2004) The Funhouse Mirror of Funhouse: Horror and/as Spectacle. Michigan State University Press.

Huddleston, T. (2022) Smile: Parker Finn on Influencing the Next Wave of Horror. Variety. Available at: https://variety.com/2022/film/news/smile-parker-finn-interview-1235401234/ (Accessed 15 October 2024).

Kawin, B.F. (2012) Horror and the Horror Film. Anthem Press.

Mitchell, D.R. (2015) Rich Vreeland and David Robert Mitchell on It Follows Soundtrack. Pitchfork. Available at: https://pitchfork.com/features/overtones/9632-overtones-it-follows/ (Accessed 15 October 2024).

Rockoff, A. (2011) Going to Pieces: The Rise and Fall of the Slasher Film, 1978–1986. McFarland.

Sharrett, C. (2015) The Ring and the Remake. In: S. Prince (ed.) The Horror Film. Rutgers University Press, pp. 345-362.

Telotte, J.P. (2001) The Devolution of Horror Cinema. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 29(2), pp. 66-74.