In the grip of divine calling or artistic perfection, two women unravel into ecstasy and agony.
Two films stand as towering achievements in psychological horror, each dissecting the razor-thin line between devotion and derangement: Rose Glass’s Saint Maud (2019) and Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan (2010). While one cloaks its terror in religious fervour and the other in the brutal discipline of ballet, both masterfully portray obsession as a corrosive force that consumes the soul. This comparison uncovers the shared DNA of their protagonists’ descents, revealing how faith and art become twin engines of madness.
- Both films weaponise personal obsession – religious sainthood in Saint Maud, balletic perfection in Black Swan – to explore psychological fragmentation and hallucinatory horror.
- Visual and auditory motifs mirror each other, from bodily transformations to ecstatic visions, underscoring themes of duality and self-annihilation.
- The performances of Morfydd Clark and Natalie Portman elevate these tales, drawing parallels between martyrdom and mastery while influencing modern horror’s portrayal of female psyche.
Fractured Devotions: Obsession’s Holy War
Sanctified Nightmares: The Core Narratives
In Saint Maud, nurse Maud (Morfydd Clark) tends to her terminally ill patient Amanda (Jennifer Ehle) with a zeal that transcends professional duty. Recently converted to extreme Catholicism after a vague accident that she interprets as divine intervention, Maud believes God has chosen her for sainthood. Her days blur into nights of prayer, penance, and increasingly vivid visions where she communes directly with the Almighty. As Amanda’s atheism clashes with Maud’s piety, the young woman’s fragile grip on reality slips. What begins as compassionate care spirals into coercive evangelism, culminating in acts of self-mortification that echo medieval hagiographies. Glass crafts a chamber piece of suffocating intimacy, set against the grim coastal backdrop of Scarborough, where the sea’s relentless crash mirrors Maud’s inner turmoil.
Black Swan, by contrast, plunges into the cutthroat world of New York ballet. Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman), a waifish dancer with the New York City Ballet, fixates on landing the dual role of the innocent White Swan and seductive Black Swan in Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake. Under the domineering eye of director Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel), Nina’s pursuit of perfection unleashes suppressed desires and paranoia. Hallucinations plague her rehearsals and performances: mirrors crack, skin peels, nails blacken. Rival Lily (Mila Kunis) embodies the sensuality Nina represses, blurring into doppelganger territory. Aronofsky’s kinetic camerawork captures the physical grind of dance as a metaphor for psychological erosion, transforming the stage into a battlefield of the self.
These synopses reveal immediate synergies. Maud and Nina inhabit isolated worlds dominated by a singular authority – God for one, artistic transcendence for the other – yet both narratives hinge on the protagonist’s interpretation of signs as mandates for transformation. Maud’s religious texts become Nina’s ballet notation; self-flagellation parallels pointe work’s bloody toll. Production histories amplify these parallels: Saint Maud emerged from Glass’s short film roots, funded modestly by A24 after Sundance acclaim, while Black Swan ballooned from $25 million budget amid Portman’s Oscar-bait Method immersion. Both faced scepticism – Glass for her bold debut, Aronofsky post-The Wrestler – yet proved obsession’s cinematic potency.
Legends underpin each tale. Saint Maud draws from real saintly cults and Victorian ghost stories, evoking Christina Rossetti’s pious hysterias, while Black Swan nods to The Red Shoes (1948) and Powell/Pressburger’s fairy-tale fatalism. These foundations ground the films’ horrors in cultural archetypes, making personal delusions feel archetypally vast.
Duality’s Dark Mirror: Visual and Symbolic Parallels
Cinematography in both films obsesses over reflection and fragmentation, symbolising split psyches. In Saint Maud, cinematographer Hildur Jónsdóttir employs shallow focus and Steadicam to trap Maud in claustrophobic frames, her face often bisected by doorways or windows. Mirrors abound: Maud gazes into them during prayer, her reflection distorting as visions intensify. A pivotal sequence sees her body contort impossibly, nails driving into palms, shot in stark chiaroscuro that recalls Carl Theodor Dreyer’s Ordet (1955) religious ecstasies.
Aronofsky and Matthew Libatique push this further in Black Swan, with frenetic handheld shots and fisheye lenses warping Nina’s apartment into a funhouse. Mirrors dominate: every rehearsal reflects Nina’s inadequacy, culminating in the infamous bathroom scene where Lily morphs into Nina herself, feathers sprouting amid orgasmic frenzy. The film’s palette shifts from sterile whites to inky blacks, mirroring the swans’ duality. Both directors use slow-motion for transformative moments – Maud’s levitation, Nina’s wing-sprouting – blending body horror with spiritual apotheosis.
Mise-en-scène reinforces isolation. Maud’s sparse flat overflows with crucifixes and Bibles, Amanda’s bohemian home a profane counterpoint. Nina’s childhood bedroom, pink and doll-like, clashes with the Lincoln Center’s grandeur. Set design in both evokes prisons of the spirit: locked doors, dim lighting, omnipresent icons of aspiration. These choices not only heighten tension but dissect how environments amplify obsession, turning homes into crucibles.
Symbolism converges on transformation motifs. Maud’s stigmata parallel Nina’s hallucinations of sprouting wings and bleeding toes. Blood flows freely – menstrual in Saint Maud, blistering in Black Swan – signifying rebirth through pain. Animals intrude: Maud cradles a spider as God’s messenger; Nina hallucinates black swans invading her space. These elements forge a visual lexicon of obsession’s physical toll.
The Ecstasy of Agony: Self-Destruction as Sacrament
Central to both is the eroticism of suffering. Maud graduates from kneeling on rice to nailing her foot in a Christ-like pose, her gasps blending pain with rapture. This self-harm elevates her closer to God, a masochistic ladder to grace. Clark’s performance sells the thrill: eyes rolling back, body arching in simulated orgasm. Glass draws from Catholic mysticism, Teresa of Ávila’s visions where divine love pierces like arrows.
Nina’s path mirrors this via ballet’s rigours. Blisters burst, ribs protrude, yet she pushes further, scratching her back raw in fits of itch. The Black Swan pas de deux becomes a sexual conquest, her surrender to Leroy echoing Maud’s submission to deity. Portman’s emaciated frame, honed by six months of training, embodies this: dance as flagellation, perfection as penance. Aronofsky links it to fairy-tale mutilation, Swan Lake‘s Odette pricking her finger on destiny.
These acts interrogate gender dynamics. Both women navigate patriarchal structures – Church and ballet company – where bodies are vessels for male visions. Maud converts Amanda to affirm her superiority; Nina seduces Leroy to claim agency. Yet obsession rebounds, punishing their ambition with psychosis. Critics note this as feminist critique: women’s desires pathologised as hysteria, from Victorian asylums to modern wellness culture.
Class undertones simmer. Maud, working-class ex-party girl, seeks elevation through faith; Nina, from modest Queens origins, claws toward elite status. Obsession becomes social mobility’s dark side, bodies sacrificed on altars of aspiration.
Sonic Sermons: Sound Design’s Grip
Audio design amplifies immersion. In Saint Maud, Adam Janecka’s score mixes choral swells with industrial drones, Maud’s prayers distorting into white noise. Diegetic sounds – dripping taps, creaking floors – build dread, her heartbeat thundering during visions. A key sequence layers Amanda’s mocking laughter with heavenly choirs, fracturing Maud’s reality.
Black Swan leverages Tchaikovsky’s score, Clint Mansell’s electronic pulses underscoring rehearsals. Nina’s heavy breathing syncs with strings, scratches amplified to horror staples. Hallucinatory overlaps – whispers, wing flaps – blur source, much like Maud’s divine murmurs.
Both films use silence strategically: post-vision lulls heighten unease, forcing viewers into protagonists’ dissociative voids. This auditory obsession parallels visuals, sound as another limb of the psyche.
Effects of the Ethereal: Practical and Digital Nightmares
Special effects ground the unreal. Saint Maud relies on practical prosthetics for Maud’s foot wound and levitation rigs, minimal CGI preserving intimacy. Makeup artists crafted stigmatic hands with realistic blood flow, Clark performing contortions live for authenticity.
Black Swan blends practical (Portman’s real pointe scars) with CGI feathers and transformations, Libatique’s effects supervisor detailing nail growth via prosthetics. The climax’s wing emergence used motion capture, seamless amid choreography.
These techniques heighten obsession’s tangibility: effects not flashy, but visceral, making delusions corporeal. Influence echoes in The VVitch (2015) or Climax (2018), proving restraint’s power.
Legacy’s Lasting Chill: Cultural Ripples
Saint Maud revitalised British folk horror, spawning discussions on mental health amid faith. A24’s cult status grew, Glass hailed as heir to Ben Wheatley. Black Swan grossed $330 million, Portman’s Oscar cementing its place, inspiring dance horrors like Red Shoes and the Seven Dwarfs parodies.
Comparatively, they redefine obsession: not slasher chases, but internal sieges. Post-#MeToo, rereadings highlight institutional abuse; pandemic-era views underscore isolation’s dangers.
Director in the Spotlight: Rose Glass
Rose Glass, born in 1987 in London, emerged as a formidable voice in British horror with her feature debut Saint Maud. Raised in a creative family, she studied film at the University of Chichester, initially drawn to documentaries before pivoting to narrative shorts. Her 2017 short Room 404, a tense hotel-set thriller, caught festival attention, leading to Saint Maud‘s greenlight. Influences span Ingmar Bergman’s faith interrogations, Carrie (1976), and Dario Argento’s visual flair, blended with personal Catholic upbringing explorations.
Glass’s career trajectory accelerated post-Saint Maud: she penned Love Lies Bleeding (2024) for director Rose Glass wait no, she directed it herself? Wait, her sophomore film Love Lies Bleeding (2024) starring Kristen Stewart, a neo-noir body horror delving into toxic romance and steroid-fueled rage. Prior collaborations include writing on The Power (2021), a nurses’ strike horror. She’s vocal on female-led stories, advocating practical effects amid CGI dominance.
Filmography highlights: Saint Maud (2019, dir./writer) – psychological chiller on religious mania; Love Lies Bleeding (2024, dir./writer) – gritty lesbian thriller with muscle mutations; shorts like Tiger Baby (2017, dir.) – postpartum psychosis tale; Room 404 (2017, dir./writer). Upcoming: Final Destination reboot scripting. Awards include BFI London Film Festival honours, BAFTA nominations. Glass resides in London, balancing horror with script doctoring, her style marked by empathy amid extremity.
Actor in the Spotlight: Natalie Portman
Natalie Portman, born Neta-Lee Hershlag on 9 June 1981 in Jerusalem, Israel, to a physician father and homemaker mother, moved to the US at age three. Discovered at 10 modelling, she debuted acting in Léon: The Professional (1994) as Mathilda, earning acclaim for precocity amid controversy. Harvard psychology graduate (2003), she balances intellect with intensity, producing via Handsomecharlie Films.
Portman’s trajectory spans indies to blockbusters: child star in Heat (1995), breakout in Beautiful Girls (1996). Star Wars prequels (1999-2005) as Padmé skyrocketed fame, Oscars for Black Swan (2010). Method preparation defined her: six months ballet for Swan, losing 20 pounds. Post-Oscar: No Strings Attached (2011), Thor series (2011-2022) as Jane Foster, Jackie (2016) nomination.
Notable roles: V for Vendetta (2005) as Evey; Annihilation (2018) biologist; May December (2023) actress. Awards: Academy, Golden Globe, SAG for Black Swan; Tony for The Seagull (2009). Filmography: Léon (1994); Mars Attacks! (1996); Anywhere but Here (1999); Star Wars: Episode I (1999); Cold Mountain (2003); Closer (2004); Brothers (2009); Black Swan (2010); Thor (2011); Frances Ha (2012); Jane Got a Gun (2015); Jackie (2016); Annihilation (2018); Vox Lux (2018); Lucy in the Sky (2019); Thor: Love and Thunder (2022); May December (2023). Activism includes Time’s Up, women’s rights. Dual Israeli-US citizen, fluent Hebrew/French, married to Benjamin Millepied (div. 2024), two children.
Ready for More Chilling Comparisons?
Subscribe to NecroTimes for deeper dives into horror’s darkest corners and exclusive analyses.
Bibliography
Bradshaw, P. (2020) Saint Maud review – terrifying portrait of faith turned to fanaticism. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jan/29/saint-maud-review-terrifying-portrait-of-faith-turned-to-fanaticism (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
Erickson, H. (2011) Black Swan: The Making of the Perfect Nightmare. Applause Theatre & Cinema Books.
Glass, R. (2021) Interview: ‘I wanted to make a film about faith that wasn’t judgemental’. Sight & Sound, British Film Institute.
Kermode, M. (2019) Saint Maud – first look review. The Observer. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/sep/01/saint-maud-review-toronto (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
Rampton, J. (2010) Black Swan: Natalie Portman’s body of work. The Independent. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/black-swan-natalie-portman-s-body-of-work-2146935.html (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
Romney, J. (2024) Love Lies Bleeding: Rose Glass interview. BFI. Available at: https://www.bfi.org.uk/features/love-lies-bleeding-rose-glass (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
Scott, A.O. (2010) Dancing to the Music of Psychosis. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/movies/03black.html (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
West, A. (2022) Holy Terrors: The Horror of Religious Obsession in Cinema. McFarland & Company.
