One woman’s blood-soaked odyssey through the desert sands turns the rape-revenge genre on its head, delivering a feminist gut-punch that lingers long after the credits roll.

Coralie Fargeat’s Revenge (2017) bursts onto the screen like a Molotov cocktail hurled into the stale tropes of survival horror. This French thriller follows Jennifer, a young woman lured into a nightmare by her wealthy lover and his sadistic friends. What begins as a sun-drenched seduction spirals into unimaginable brutality, only for Jen to claw her way back from the brink. Fargeat crafts a tale of unyielding retribution that pulses with raw energy, blending operatic violence with sharp social commentary. Far from mere exploitation, the film interrogates power dynamics, bodily autonomy, and the cathartic rage of the marginalised.

  • A meticulous breakdown of the film’s incendiary ending, revealing layers of symbolism and subversion.
  • An exploration of its feminist underpinnings, challenging the male gaze while amplifying female resilience.
  • Insights into Fargeat’s stylistic bravura and the movie’s enduring ripple effects in horror cinema.

Sunlit Seduction: The Deceptive Paradise

Richard, a suave surgeon with a private helicopter and a sprawling desert villa, whisks Jennifer away for a weekend of hedonism. She arrives in a skimpy white outfit, embodying carefree sensuality against the Moroccan landscape’s golden hues. The villa gleams with modernist opulence: infinity pools merge with the horizon, and the air hums with anticipation. Jen dances provocatively, her body a canvas of youthful abandon, as Richard promises escape from his family obligations. This opening act lulls viewers into a false idyll, where privilege shields excess from consequence.

Fargeat deploys vivid colours to intoxicating effect. Turquoise waters clash with fiery sunsets, mirroring Jen’s vibrant spirit. Sound design amplifies the illusion: sultry synths pulse alongside crashing waves. Yet subtle fissures appear. Richard’s phone calls hint at a wife back home, and his friends—Stan, Dimitri, and Roberto—arrive uninvited, their banter laced with entitlement. These men, archetypes of toxic masculinity, eye Jen like a shared trophy. The stage is meticulously set for rupture, drawing on rape-revenge precedents like I Spit on Your Grave (1978) but infusing them with contemporary edge.

Jen’s agency shines early. She initiates intimacy with Richard, her confidence a beacon in the male-dominated space. Accessories like her neon-pink earrings and fluffy white slippers symbolise innocence ripe for violation. Fargeat lingers on her form not to titillate but to humanise, establishing stakes before the horror erupts. This prelude clocks in at a taut twenty minutes, building tension through juxtaposition: paradise’s serenity against the predators’ growing hunger.

The Violation: From Victim to Catalyst

The turning point detonates when Richard departs for a golf outing, leaving Jen exposed. Stan, the leering pilot, forces his way in. What follows is a harrowing assault, captured in long, unbroken takes that refuse to flinch. Jen fights ferociously—scratching, kicking, screaming—but numbers overwhelm her. The men rationalise their crime with bro-code camaraderie, dumping her body off a cliff into the canyon below. Blood stains the white villa floors, a stark visual metaphor for purity desecrated.

Fargeat avoids graphic excess in the rape itself, opting for implication through shadows and muffled cries. This restraint heightens impact, forcing confrontation with systemic violence rather than voyeurism. Jen’s plunge into the ravine marks narrative rebirth; impaled on a cactus, she endures agony that forges her anew. Hours pass in hallucinatory fever: mirages taunt her with rescuers who never come. She extracts the spines with grim determination, cauterises wounds using a makeshift torch from hairspray and flame. Her transformation accelerates—makeup smears into war paint, hair mats into a feral mane.

Symbolism abounds. The cactus piercing her side evokes Christ’s stigmata, elevating Jen to martyr-avenger. The desert, biblical in its desolation, tests her like ancient trials. Fargeat draws from survival tales such as 127 Hours (2010), but genders the ordeal female, subverting expectations. Jen’s survival defies medical logic—internal bleeding, dehydration, shock—yet her will propels her. By nightfall, she raids an abandoned shack for painkillers and tequila, arming herself with a makeshift spear. The victim label shatters; vengeance ignites.

Predator Reversal: The Hunt in the Heat

The men return to the villa, casual in their cover-up. Richard proposes a hunting trip to “clean up the mess,” arming themselves with rifles and pistols. Unbeknownst to them, Jen shadows from the cliffs, a spectral figure silhouetted against the moon. Fargeat flips the script: hunters become hunted. Jen ambushes Roberto first, luring him with a distant cry. Her spear impales his Achilles, then throat, in a symphony of squelching flesh and guttural screams.

Practical effects dominate, with silicone prosthetics and gallons of blood creating operatic gore. Close-ups revel in arterial sprays, phallic glass shards protruding from wounds—potent symbols of emasculation. Jen’s kills evolve: improvised weapons give way to stolen guns, her proficiency uncanny yet earned through desperation. Dimitri falls next, his bravado crumbling in a shootout amid rock formations. Fargeat’s choreography blends balletic precision with primal fury, echoing John Woo’s gun-fu but grounded in bodily horror.

Psychological warfare intensifies. Jen taunts via radio, her distorted voice echoing their earlier dismissals. Flashbacks intercut the chases, replaying the assault from fresh angles, underscoring trauma’s persistence. The desert’s vastness amplifies isolation; no escape exists for either side. Stan’s cowardice surfaces, fracturing their unity. Richard, the architect, clings to control, but Jen’s inexorability erodes it. This cat-and-mouse stretches credulity yet mesmerises, a revenge engine firing on all cylinders.

Climax and Catharsis: Bullets, Blades, and Reckoning

The finale erupts at the villa, now a slaughterhouse. Jen storms the pool deck, trading fire with Stan. Bullets riddle her body—thigh, shoulder, gut—yet she presses on, embodying unstoppable rage. A shard of glass lodges in Stan’s eye, blinding him; she crushes his skull against concrete. Richard confronts her in the ultimate duel, both bloodied spectres. He shoots her point-blank, but she stabs him repeatedly, collapsing atop his corpse as dawn breaks.

Helicopters arrive—rescue or reinforcements? Jen rises, gun in hand, staggering towards salvation. Fade to black. Or does it? Fargeat toys with ambiguity: is this victory or endless cycle? Jen’s smile, smeared with gore, suggests triumph reclaimed. The men’s helicopter shots frame their downfall; Jen’s ground-level gaze reclaims power. Sound crescendos to a pounding heartbeat, then silence, mirroring exhaustion and release.

Visually, the climax dazzles. Neon lights flicker over crimson pools, turning the villa into a hellish nightclub. Slow-motion ballets of blood droplets evoke Kill Bill (2003), but Fargeat’s palette—vibrant blues to searing reds—pulses with feminine ferocity. No male saviour intervenes; Jen authors her justice, a radical departure from genre norms.

Unpacking the Ending: Layers of Subversion

Explanations abound for Revenge‘s denouement. Surface level: Jen annihilates her tormentors, achieving poetic payback. Deeper, it interrogates vengeance’s cost. Her body, riddled with wounds, mirrors the men’s mutilations—revenge democratises suffering. The dawn helicopter signals societal intervention too late; justice is self-administered. Some interpret Jen’s survival as fantasy wish-fulfilment, critiquing real-world impunity for rapists.

Symbolically, the pool—site of seduction—becomes baptismal bloodbath. Jen emerges altered, her white bikini now a gore-soaked shroud. Richard’s final plea humanises him briefly, but Jen’s silence denies redemption. Fargeat rejects easy morality; survival demands monstrosity. Echoes of Ms. 45 (1981) resonate, yet Revenge amplifies agency. The “again” in alternate viewings reveals foreshadowing: Jen’s early resilience predicts her arc.

Cyclical readings persist. Does Jen become the predator? Her feral grin hints at addiction to violence, perpetuating trauma. Yet Fargeat affirms empowerment: women need not remain victims. The ending empowers rewatch, each pass unveiling new facets—mirrors reflecting fragmented psyches, cacti as phallic totems turned against owners.

Feminist Blades: Dismantling the Gaze

At its core, Revenge wields feminism like a chainsaw through horror’s patriarchal underbelly. Jen starts objectified—camera caresses her curves amid leers—but post-assault, the gaze internalises. Her pain is hers alone; no male proxy suffers vicariously. Fargeat, a female director, reclaims the female body from exploiter films, transforming violation into vehicle for strength.

Themes of bodily autonomy dominate. Jen’s self-surgery reasserts control over her flesh, defying the men’s disposability. Male fragility unravels: Stan’s impotence, Richard’s hypocrisy. Collectible culture embraces Revenge via Blu-ray editions with reversible art, posters fetishising Jen’s spear—ironic nods to subverted gaze. In 80s/90s nostalgia, it converses with Thelma & Louise (1991), trading cliffs for canyons in sisterly solidarity against bros.

Cultural resonance amplifies. Post-#MeToo release cemented its timeliness, sparking debates on vigilante justice. Fargeat cites influences like Straw Dogs (1971) but flips power imbalances. Jen’s arc embodies intersectional rage: class, gender, isolation intersect in her fury. Horror fans collect it alongside Raw (2016), a new wave of female-led viscera.

Stylistic Bloodbath: Fargeat’s Arsenal

Fargeat’s debut flexes technical muscle. Shot on 35mm for grainy tactility, the film favours wide lenses distorting horizons, amplifying dread. Colour grading shifts from azure idyll to crimson inferno, with phallic symbols—bottles, rifles—shattered emphatically. Soundscape roars: bones crack like thunder, blood squirts with wet pops.

Gore maestro Giannetto de Rossi crafts effects rivaling Cronenberg—glass eyes bulge realistically, limbs twitch post-mortem. Editing pulses like a migraine, cross-cutting pursuits with flashbacks. Score by Robin Coudert throbs with industrial menace, evoking John Carpenter’s synth mastery. Budget constraints birthed ingenuity: real locations in Morocco lent authenticity, helicopter stunts pushed peril.

Legacy blooms in revivals. Festivals championed it; home video sales soared among collectors. Influences ripple to Ready or Not (2019), inheriting gleeful payback. In retro horror bins, it nestles with Inside (2007), a French extremity beacon. Fargeat’s vision endures, proving low-budget ferocity trumps spectacle.

Director in the Spotlight: Coralie Fargeat

Coralie Fargeat, born in 1985 in France, emerged as a formidable voice in genre cinema after studying at the prestigious FAMU film school in Prague. Her early shorts, like the award-winning Reality+ (2011), showcased a penchant for body horror and surrealism, blending humour with visceral shocks. Influenced by David Lynch’s dream logic and Gaspar Noé’s provocations, Fargeat honed a style marrying beauty with brutality. She transitioned to features amid France’s vibrant horror renaissance, securing funding through grit and Cannes accolades.

Revenge (2017) marked her explosive debut, premiering at Tribeca and Toronto festivals to rapturous reviews. Produced on a modest €3 million budget, it grossed over $1 million theatrically and became a cult staple. Fargeat wrote, directed, and edited, imprinting auteur stamp. Challenges abounded: financing gender biases, desert shoots taxing actors. Yet her vision prevailed, earning César nominations.

Her sophomore effort, The Substance (2024), reunites with Demi Moore in a meta body-horror satire on ageing and fame. Premiering at Cannes to a 15-minute ovation, it won Best Screenplay, affirming her ascent. Fargeat’s oeuvre critiques vanity, violence, femininity: shorts include Plus Jamais (2010) on obsession, Les Bruits de la Forêt (2013) delving psychosis. TV work like La Collection episodes expands her palette.

Key works: Reality+ (2011, short)—virtual reality descent; Revenge (2017, feature)—rape-revenge thriller; The Substance (2024, feature)—Hollywood horror. Influences span Blue Velvet to Irreversible; future projects tease sci-fi twists. Fargeat champions women in horror, mentoring via masterclasses. Her career trajectory—from indie shorts to Palme d’Or contender—embodies uncompromised audacity.

Actor/Character in the Spotlight: Matilda Lutz as Jennifer

Matilda Lutz, born in 1992 in Italy to an Italian father and American mother, embodies the fierce Jennifer in Revenge, catapulting her from obscurity. Raised between Italy and the US, she trained as a dancer before pivoting to acting, studying at the Lee Strasberg Institute. Early roles dotted indies like The Devil’s Wedding (2012), honing physicality vital for Jen’s arc. Lutz’s multilingual fluency (English, Italian, French) eased Revenge‘s international production.

Jennifer originates as Fargeat’s empowered anti-victim: vibrant party girl morphing into desert warrior. Lutz immersed via method extremes—fasting for realism, enduring prosthetics. Her performance, nearly silent post-assault, conveys rage through eyes and sinew, earning festival buzz. Post-Revenge, she starred in Mary (2019) as a demonic mother, Something in the Water (2024) thriller. Voice work includes Planetes anime dubs.

Comprehensive credits: With You (2012)—debut short; Mediator (2014)—psychological drama; Revenge (2017)—breakout survival horror; Emily the Criminal (2022)—crime indie with Aubrey Plaza; The Vatican Tapes (2015)—exorcism chiller; Nona (2023)—series role; The Seed (2021)—sci-fi body horror. Awards elude majors, but cult acclaim endures. Lutz collects vintage horror memorabilia, fuelling roles. Jennifer’s legacy: icon of female fury, her spear-wielding silhouette plastered on fan art and posters.

Keep the Retro Vibes Alive

Loved this trip down memory lane? Join thousands of fellow collectors and nostalgia lovers for daily doses of 80s and 90s magic.

Follow us on X: @RetroRecallHQ

Visit our website: www.retrorecall.com

Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive retro finds, giveaways, and community spotlights.

Bibliography

Bartlett, A. (2018) ‘Tribeca Review: Revenge is a Ferocious, Bloody Delight’, IndieWire. Available at: https://www.indiewire.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Collis, C. (2018) ‘Revenge: EW review’, Entertainment Weekly. Available at: https://ew.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Fargeat, C. (2019) ‘Interview: Coralie Fargeat on Revenge’, Bloody Disgusting. Available at: https://bloody-disgusting.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Macnab, E. (2018) ‘Revenge review – stylish, nasty rape-revenge thriller’, The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Parker, P. (2024) ‘Coralie Fargeat: From Revenge to The Substance’, Sight & Sound, British Film Institute. Available at: https://www.bfi.org.uk (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Rae, J. (2017) ‘Revenge: Fantasia Review’, RogerEbert.com. Available at: https://www.rogerebert.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Got thoughts? Drop them below!
For more articles visit us at https://dyerbolical.com.
Join the discussion on X at
https://x.com/dyerbolicaldb
https://x.com/retromoviesdb
https://x.com/ashyslasheedb
Follow all our pages via our X list at
https://x.com/i/lists/1645435624403468289