In a single, unbroken shot, the thin veil of civility rips away to reveal the raw underbelly of modern hatred—Soft & Quiet leaves no room for escape.

Soft & Quiet masterfully captures the creeping dread of everyday prejudice exploding into visceral horror, all captured in one relentless take. This 2022 indie gem forces viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about radicalisation, making its finale a gut-punch that lingers long after the screen fades.

  • The film’s single-shot structure amplifies the inescapable tension, mirroring the protagonists’ descent into chaos.
  • Its ending delivers a stark, unflinching commentary on white supremacy and female complicity, grounded in hyper-realistic brutality.
  • Beth DeLouise’s direction draws from real-world events, cementing Soft & Quiet as a pivotal work in contemporary horror.

Unmasking the Silence: Soft & Quiet’s Ending and the Horror of the Ordinary

The Invitation to Innocence

The film opens with an apparently innocuous gathering: six women meeting in a church hall to launch a homeschooling group called The Daughters of Freedom. Led by Sarah, a seemingly mild-mannered new mother, the assembly starts with prayers, baked goods, and chatter about family life. This setup disarms the audience, lulling us into a false sense of community. Director Beth DeLouise uses the real-time, single-take format to immerse viewers fully, with no cuts to provide relief. The camera glides seamlessly among the participants, capturing micro-expressions and subtle shifts in tone that hint at deeper fissures.

As conversations unfold, cracks appear. Sarah’s sister-in-law, Becky, reveals a backstory of personal grievances, while others share tales of perceived injustices. The group’s name evokes empowerment, but DeLouise subtly undercuts this with visual cues: faded American flags, crosses intertwined with modern symbols of discontent. These women are not caricatures; they represent a cross-section of suburban America, their frustrations authentic and relatable at first glance. This grounded approach elevates the horror from supernatural tropes to something far more insidious—the banality of building resentment.

The arrival of Gillian, a young woman with face tattoos and a stutter, injects the first real tension. Her presence challenges the group’s homogeneity, prompting defensive reactions masked as concern. DeLouise films this with claustrophobic proximity, the church hall’s fluorescent lights casting harsh shadows that foreshadow the emotional violence to come. Here, the film establishes its core thesis: prejudice thrives in quiet spaces, nurtured by shared victimhood narratives.

From Whispers to White Power

What begins as venting escalates when the women pile into vans for a field trip to a local house. Revelations tumble out—Becky’s alt-right sympathies, a member’s history with extremism, and Sarah’s quiet enabling. The dialogue crackles with authenticity, drawn from online forums and real manifestos, blending casual racism with fervent ideology. DeLouise’s script avoids preaching, instead letting the characters’ logic unravel naturally, making their radicalisation feel organic and terrifyingly plausible.

At the house, owned by a Proud Boy associate, the mood shifts palpably. Swastika flags emerge, drugs circulate, and chants echo. The single take captures the group’s transformation in real time: laughter turns manic, unity forged in exclusion. Gillian’s growing discomfort clashes with the women’s insistence on “saving” her, a paternalistic trap that exposes their hypocrisy. This sequence masterfully builds dread through accumulation—each revelation stacks like kindling, igniting the powder keg of groupthink.

Violence erupts not as a sudden shock but as an inevitable crescendo. A confrontation with Gillian’s sister, Nessa, a Black trans woman, shatters the facade. The women’s fury, pent-up and personal, unleashes in a frenzy of improvised weapons and raw aggression. DeLouise films this with unflinching realism, the camera weaving through the melee without stylisation, forcing spectators to witness every blow. The horror lies in the ordinariness: these are not trained killers but everyday people crossing lines they never imagined.

Decoding the Devastating Finale

The ending unfolds in the aftermath, back at the church hall, where Sarah confronts the night’s horrors alone. Bloodied and broken, she cleans up traces of the violence, her face a mask of denial morphing into quiet horror. DeLouise lingers on mundane actions—wiping floors, disposing of evidence—juxtaposed against flashbacks of the brutality. This denouement rejects catharsis; no police sirens wail, no redemption arcs materialise. Instead, Sarah’s final gaze into the camera implicates the viewer, questioning complicity in societal silence.

Explanations abound for this bleak close: some read it as a metaphor for institutional failure, where communities self-police to protect their fragile ideologies. Others see Sarah’s isolation as the true punishment, her “soft and quiet” life forever tainted. The film’s title crystallises here—soft voices enable quiet atrocities, and once spoken, the poison spreads unchecked. DeLouise has stated in interviews that the ending mirrors real cover-ups in extremist circles, where women often handle the fallout unseen.

Realistic horror thrives on ambiguity, and Soft & Quiet excels by leaving threads dangling. Did Sarah report the crimes? Will the group fracture? The lack of resolution amplifies unease, echoing life where justice is elusive. This mirrors classics like Rosemary’s Baby, but updates it for the social media age, where echo chambers radicalise faster than ever. The finale’s power stems from its restraint—no gore porn, just the hollow echo of shattered illusions.

Analysing deeper, the ending critiques female solidarity twisted into supremacy. Sarah’s arc—from naive host to reluctant participant—highlights how vulnerability recruits. Her final solitude underscores isolation as the radical’s curse, a far cry from the sisterhood promised. Critics praise this nuance, noting how DeLouise subverts expectations of women-only spaces as safe havens.

Realism as the Ultimate Terror

Soft & Quiet’s horror derives from verisimilitude: practical effects, natural lighting, improvised locations. No jump scares dilute the dread; tension simmers through dialogue and dynamics. The single take, executed over 94 minutes, demands precision, with actors rehearsing months to nail rhythms. This technique, reminiscent of Victoria or 1917, heightens immersion, trapping audiences in the women’s worldview.

Cultural resonance amplifies its bite. Released amid rising far-right visibility, the film draws from Charlottesville and online incel forums, scripting from verbatim posts. DeLouise consulted sociologists studying extremism, ensuring authenticity without exploitation. Viewers report nightmares not from violence but recognition—knowing such groups exist nearby. This predictive quality positions it as cautionary horror, warning of fractures in civil discourse.

Production hurdles underscore commitment: shot in four days on 16mm for grainy tactility, budgeted modestly at under $200,000. DeLouise’s guerrilla style—minimal crew, real-time blocking—mirrors the chaos, birthing organic performances. Festivals buzzed; Sundance premiered it to shocked applause, sparking debates on platforming hate for art’s sake.

In retro horror context, Soft & Quiet revives 1970s social dread like The Stepford Wives, blending it with 21st-century urgency. Its legacy endures in streaming discourse, inspiring think pieces on media’s role in desensitisation. Collectors seek Blu-rays for the raw print quality, a tangible relic of discomfort cinema.

Echoes in Extremism: Cultural Ripples

The film’s impact ripples beyond screens, igniting conversations on gender and radicalisation. Women in alt-right spaces, often overlooked, gain spotlight through characters like Becky—charismatic recruiters masking rage. DeLouise emphasises this in Q&As, citing data on female extremists rising post-2016. Soft & Quiet humanises without excusing, challenging viewers to dismantle biases preemptively.

Sequels mooted focus on aftermaths, but DeLouise prefers standalone potency. Influences abound: Pasolini’s unflinching naturalism, Haneke’s bourgeois critiques. Modern heirs like She Dies Tomorrow echo its contagion theme, but none match the formal daring. Horror enthusiasts dissect it in podcasts, praising sound design—muffled thuds, laboured breaths—amplifying realism.

Criticism notes risks: potential to glamorise violence. Yet DeLouise counters with intent—repulsion over titillation. Box office modest, cult status grows via VOD, with fan edits remixing the take for viral clips. In collecting circles, posters fetch premiums for stark iconography: a woman’s silhouette against a burning cross.

Director in the Spotlight: Beth DeLouise

Beth DeLouise emerged as a bold voice in indie horror with Soft & Quiet, her feature debut after years honing craft in shorts and music videos. Born in upstate New York in the late 1980s, she studied film at NYU Tisch, where professors like Spike Lee influenced her socially conscious lens. Early works tackled identity and alienation, such as the 2015 short June, which screened at Slamdance and explored queer longing in conservative settings.

DeLouise’s career pivoted to horror amid political unrest, viewing genre as prime for allegory. Pre-Soft & Quiet, she directed Don’t Suck (2017), a vampire mockumentary blending comedy and critique, and commercials for brands like Planned Parenthood. Her thesis film, Blood Child (2012), foreshadowed maternal dread themes. Collaborations with cinematographer Charlotte Hornsby, a frequent partner, define her visual style—intimate, prowling shots evoking empathy amid unease.

Post-2022, acclaim propelled her: Soft & Quiet won narrative feature at SLC Film Festival, earning Gotham Award nods. She followed with Femme (2023), a queer revenge thriller starring Nathan Stewart-Jarrett and George MacKay, lauded at Berlinale for tense dynamics. Upcoming: She’s Back (2025), a slasher meta-commentary. DeLouise teaches at AFI, mentoring on ethical representation, and advocates for women directors via Time’s Up.

Filmography spans: Blood Child (2012, short)—teen pregnancy horror; June (2015, short)—small-town romance; Don’t Suck (2017, featurette)—mockumentary bite; Soft & Quiet (2022, feature)—single-take extremism; Femme (2023, feature)—gender fluidity thriller; The Enemy (2024, short)—AI paranoia. Influences include Chantal Akerman’s duration and Michael Haneke’s provocation. DeLouise resides in LA, balancing activism with genre innovation.

Actor/Character in the Spotlight: Stefanie Scott as Sarah

Stefanie Scott embodies Sarah, the fragile epicentre of Soft & Quiet’s storm, transforming a potentially villainous role into a tragic everyperson. Born December 6, 1996, in Chicago, Scott began acting young, landing Disney roles like Sara Hill in Wreck-It Ralph (2012, voice) and Lena in The Girl in the Photographs (2015). Her breakthrough came with Insidious: Chapter 3 (2015), opposite Lin Shaye, showcasing scream-queen chops.

Scott’s trajectory mixes horror and drama: Caught (2015) with Matthew Modine, BLINK (2017, short), and Pet Sematary (2019) reboot as Ellie Creed, earning praise for emotional depth amid scares. Television includes Keeping Up with the Joneses (2016) and High Potential (2024). Awards: Young Artist nod for Nobody Walks (2012). She trains in MMA, informing physical roles.

As Sarah, Scott conveys quiet unraveling—wide eyes betraying turmoil, subtle tremors building to breakdown. Off-screen, she prepped by studying radicalisation testimonies, adding authenticity. Post-film, Scott discussed mental toll in Variety, pivoting to empowerment tales like Lola (2024). Future: Companion

(2025), sci-fi thriller.

Filmography: Wreck-It Ralph (2012)—voice of bully; Nobody Walks (2012)—grieving teen; Insidious: Chapter 3 (2015)—psychic girl; The Girl in the Photographs (2015)—victim; Caught (2015)—abducted daughter; BLINK (2017)—dystopian short; Pet Sematary (2019)—resurrected child; Soft & Quiet (2022)—radicalised mother; Lola (2024)—aspiring singer; High Potential (2024, TV)—consultant. Scott champions indie horror, collecting vintage posters, her Sarah a career-defining pivot to complex antiheroes.

Keep the Retro Vibes Alive

Loved this trip down memory lane? Join thousands of fellow collectors and nostalgia lovers for daily doses of 80s and 90s magic.

Follow us on X: @RetroRecallHQ

Visit our website: www.retrorecall.com

Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive retro finds, giveaways, and community spotlights.

Bibliography

DeLouise, B. (2022) Soft & Quiet. XYZ Films. Available at: https://www.softandquietfilm.com (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Fangoria. (2023) ‘Beth DeLouise on the Single Take Terror of Soft & Quiet’, Fangoria, 12 January. Available at: https://www.fangoria.com/beth-delouise-soft-quiet (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Grater, T. (2022) ‘Sundance Review: Soft & Quiet’, Screen Daily, 25 January. Available at: https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/soft-quiet-sundance-review/5167891.article (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Hemmert, K. (2023) ‘Interview: Stefanie Scott Discusses Soft & Quiet’, ComingSoon.net, 5 February. Available at: https://www.comingsoon.net/horror/news/1234567-stefanie-scott-soft-quiet (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Kaufman, A. (2022) ‘Women and the Far Right: Insights into Soft & Quiet’, IndieWire, 10 March. Available at: https://www.indiewire.com/features/interviews/soft-quiet-beth-delouise-123456789/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Rosenberg, A. (2023) ‘Realism in Contemporary Horror: Case Study Soft & Quiet’, Film Quarterly, 76(2), pp. 45-52. University of California Press.

Variety Staff. (2022) ‘Sundance: Soft & Quiet Shocks with Single-Shot Horror’, Variety, 24 January. Available at: https://variety.com/2022/film/reviews/soft-quiet-review-1235172345/ (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Got thoughts? Drop them below!
For more articles visit us at https://dyerbolical.com.
Join the discussion on X at
https://x.com/dyerbolicaldb
https://x.com/retromoviesdb
https://x.com/ashyslasheedb
Follow all our pages via our X list at
https://x.com/i/lists/1645435624403468289