Veiled Tyrants: Power and Abuse in the Invisible Man’s Dual Reign

When invisibility cloaks not just the body, but the soul’s darkest impulses, power becomes the ultimate predator.

In the annals of horror cinema, few concepts have evolved as profoundly as that of the invisible man, a figure born from scientific hubris in the early sound era and reborn in the grip of contemporary domestic terror. This comparison unearths the thematic bedrock of power and abuse across James Whale’s 1933 masterpiece and Leigh Whannell’s 2020 reinterpretation, revealing how the unseen monster mirrors society’s shifting fears—from unchecked ambition to insidious control.

• The 1933 film’s portrayal of scientific madness unleashing anarchic power contrasts sharply with the 2020 version’s calculated relational abuse, highlighting an evolution from individual corruption to systemic domination.
• Both narratives weaponise invisibility to explore abuse, yet Whale emphasises spectacle and chaos while Whannell delves into psychological realism and gaslighting.
• Cinematic legacies intertwine, proving the invisible man’s enduring mythic potency in critiquing power’s corrupting veil across nearly a century.

The Birth of Unseen Chaos

James Whale’s The Invisible Man (1933), adapted from H.G. Wells’s 1897 novel, introduces Jack Griffin, a chemist whose invisibility serum spirals him into megalomania. Arriving bandaged at a rural inn, Griffin’s experiment unravels his sanity; the serum’s side effect, monomania, fuels his godlike delusions. He sheds his wrappings in a triumphant scene, his resonant voice—delivered by Claude Rains—booming through empty clothes, proclaiming, “We will begin with a reign of terror.” This moment cements the film’s mythic origin: power as an intoxicating elixir that dissolves morality.

The narrative unfolds with Griffin’s rampage, terrorising villagers through pranks escalating to murder. His abuse manifests publicly—beating his rival, derailing a train, terrorising Iping with invisible assaults. Whale infuses gothic spectacle; fog-shrouded moors and expressionist shadows amplify isolation. Griffin’s girlfriend Flora and colleague Kemp bear witness to his descent, pleading futilely as power corrupts absolutely. The climax sees him cornered in snow, footprints betraying his hubris, shot dead in a barn, his body materialising in death’s embrace.

Rooted in Wells’s cautionary tale of imperialism’s perils, Whale transforms it into Universal’s monster rally cry. Production drew from real scientific intrigue; the serum’s formula nods to contemporary chemistry debates. Special effects pioneer John P. Fulton crafted bandages, wires, and optical printing for seamless invisibility, earning accolades. Griffin’s abuse is anarchic, a broad satire on authority, reflecting Depression-era disillusionment with elites gone rogue.

Yet beneath the farce lurks profound horror: power’s invisibility enables impunity. Griffin abuses society writ large, his reign a metaphor for unseen economic forces crushing the masses. Whale, a gay Englishman scarred by war, infuses queer subtext; Griffin’s concealment echoes societal closets, his unmasking a tragic exposure.

Reimagining the Domestic Phantom

Leigh Whannell’s The Invisible Man (2020) discards Wells’s plot for a modern parable of intimate partner abuse. Cecilia Kass, played by Elisabeth Moss, escapes her controlling ophthalmologist boyfriend Adrian Griffin, only to endure his posthumous torment via a hidden invisibility suit. Whannell relocates the myth to tech-bro opulence: Adrian’s cliffside mansion symbolises entrapment, his suicide a ruse for spectral revenge.

The plot meticulously charts Cecilia’s gaslighting nightmare. Invisible forces bruise her, sabotage her job, frame her for murders—poisoning her sister, slashing her ex’s throat. Sightlines become weapons; Adrian’s gaze invades through optics, his abuse psychological warfare. Cecilia’s arc from victim to avenger peaks in the finale: she unmasks him in his panic room, forcing suicide before his brother’s eyes. Whannell’s script, penned amid #MeToo reckonings, elevates abuse from spectacle to systemic reality.

Effects evolve with CGI and practical prosthetics; the suit’s shimmer nods to Fulton’s legacy while grounding horror in plausibility. Moss’s performance anchors the terror—eyes darting at voids, body recoiling from phantom touches. Production navigated COVID delays, heightening timeliness. Whannell draws from Saw roots for tension, but pivots to social horror, critiquing disbelief faced by abuse survivors.

Adrian’s power stems not from serum madness, but engineered dominance: surveillance cams, wealth, intellect weaponised invisibly. This Griffin abuses privately, eroding Cecilia’s reality, a far cry from 1933’s public spectacle. The film indicts tech-enabled control, echoing real stalker tech horrors.

Power’s Corrosive Essence Unveiled

Central to both is power’s transformative venom. In 1933, invisibility catalyses Griffin’s solipsism; he declares himself “a god,” abusing omnipotence indiscriminately. Whale’s Griffin embodies Nietzschean warnings: power without responsibility breeds tyranny. His pranks—scaring policemen, invisible wrestling—escalate to mass murder, power unchecked by visibility’s accountability.

Conversely, 2020’s Adrian wields power surgically, his abuse a scalpel of doubt. Pre-invisibility, he controlled Cecilia’s career, diet, friendships; post-mortem, it persists spectrally. Whannell illustrates power as relational currency, invisible long before the suit. Both Griffins share hubris—scientific genius presuming mastery over nature—but Whale’s is flamboyantly destructive, Whannell’s insidiously pervasive.

This evolution tracks cultural shifts: 1930s power fears were top-down, mad scientists or tycoons rampaging amid economic collapse. By 2020, power hides in partnerships, algorithms, unseen biases. The invisible man mutates from lone wolf to networked abuser, his myth adapting to intimate tyrannies.

Mise-en-scène reinforces: Whale’s wide shots capture chaotic voids amid crowds; Whannell’s claustrophobic frames trap Cecilia in ordinary spaces turned hostile. Lighting plays pivotal—backlit silhouettes in 1933 evoke divinity; stark realism in 2020 exposes mundane evil.

Abuse’s Spectral Threads

Abuse diverges starkly yet converges mythically. 1933’s Griffin abuses broadly—betraying Kemp, terrorising innkeepers, endangering Flora indirectly. His violence is physical comedy laced with horror, power’s abuse democratised yet impersonal. Victims are everymen, underscoring class warfare subtext.

Whannell’s abuse is intimate partner violence incarnate: Adrian’s gaslighting mimics real tactics, bruises blooming unseen, alibis ironclad. Cecilia’s institutional betrayal—dismissed by police, hospital—amplifies isolation. Moss conveys layered trauma: defiance mingled with fracture, her screams echoing silent pleas.

Both exploit invisibility’s impunity; no consequences without proof. Yet 1933 romanticises Griffin’s bravado—his laughter manic, seductive—while 2020 vilifies Adrian’s banality, his whistling taunt chillingly ordinary. This shift demythologises the monster, humanising abuse’s perpetrators as boyfriends, not gods.

Folklore echoes: the invisible man draws from djinn or yokai invisibility granting malevolence, but Wells secularises it. Cinema amplifies abuse as power’s shadow self, evolving from gothic excess to social realism.

Monstrous Effects and Mythic Craft

Special effects chronicle the monster’s maturation. Fulton’s 1933 innovations—split-screen, rear projection—defined practical wizardry, smoke revealing Griffin’s cigar puffs, footprints in snow poetic justice. Makeup shrouded Rains, his voice the monster’s soul, resonant baritone conveying arrogance.

2020 blends homage with modernity: Oliver Jackson-Cohen’s Adrian dons a latex suit with motion-capture, CGI erasing form selectively. Practical stunts—falling glasses, levitating sheets—ground digital feats, ensuring tactility. Whannell consulted Fulton archives, bridging eras visually.

These techniques underscore thematic power: 1933’s effects dazzle, mirroring Griffin’s showmanship; 2020’s subtlety evokes dread’s accumulation. Both elevate invisibility from gimmick to metaphor, absence as presence.

Echoes Through the Decades

The 1933 film’s legacy permeates Universal’s canon—sequels spawned invisible agents, women, even a kid—diffusing the monster into pulp heroism. Whale’s influence ripples to Hollow Man, Predator. Culturally, it satirises fascism’s rise, invisibility as unchecked authority.

Whannell’s reboot grosses amid lockdowns, invisibility prescient for remote surveillance fears. It spawns sequel teases, Moss’s Cecilia empowered. Critically, it reclaims the myth for #MeToo, power’s abuse demystified.

Comparatively, both critique visibility’s tyranny: society’s blind spots enable monsters. From Whale’s spectacle to Whannell’s subtlety, the invisible man endures, power and abuse eternally unseen yet omnipresent.

Director in the Spotlight

James Whale, born in 1889 in Dudley, England, to a working-class family, rose from theatre amid World War I trauma—gassed at Passchendaele, he channelled scars into art. Post-war, he directed West End hits like Journey’s End (1929), earning acclaim for stark humanism. Hollywood beckoned; Universal signed him for Frankenstein (1931), birthing Boris Karloff’s icon and Whale’s monster legacy.

Whale helmed The Old Dark House (1932), a gothic ensemble; The Invisible Man (1933) followed, blending horror with screwball wit. Frankenstein‘s sequel Bride of Frankenstein (1935) showcased his pinnacle—operatic pathos, queer coding. Later, Werewolf of London (1935), The Invisible Ray (1936) expanded Universal’s cycle.

Influenced by German expressionism and music hall, Whale infused camp flamboyance; his homosexuality, amid Hays Code strictures, veiled rebellion. Post-Universal, he directed Show Boat (1936), musical triumphs. Retiring to California, he painted surrealists, battled dementia. Tragically, Whale drowned himself in 1957, his life mirrored in Bill Condon’s Gods and Monsters (1998), earning Ian McKellen Oscar nods.

Filmography highlights: Journeys End (1930)—stage-to-film war drama; Frankenstein (1931)—iconic adaptation; The Old Dark House (1932)—eccentric horror; The Invisible Man (1933)—science-gone-mad romp; Bride of Frankenstein (1935)—masterpiece sequel; Werewolf of London (1935)—lycanthrope precursor; The Invisible Ray (1936)—Karloff radiation horror; The Road Back (1937)—anti-war epic; Show Boat (1936, 1936 re-release)—musical spectacle; Sinners in Paradise (1938)—adventure drama. Whale’s oeuvre, 20+ features, redefined horror’s wit and pathos.

Actor in the Spotlight

Claude Rains, born 1889 in London to actor parents, endured childhood abuse and belladonna poisoning, damaging his voice to a husky timbre. Theatre prodigy, he taught at RADA, mentoring Laurence Olivier. War service blinded him temporarily; post-recovery, Broadway beckoned with The Man Who Reclaimed His Head.

Hollywood debut in The Invisible Man (1933) skyrocketed him—voicing Griffin unseen, his aristocratic sneer defined villainy. The Invisible Man Returns (1940) reprised the role. Casablanca’s (1942) Captain Renault earned stardom, Oscar nod for Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939). Notorious (1946), Lawrence of Arabia (1962) showcased range.

Rains navigated typecasting masterfully, blending menace and charm. Four Oscar nominations total; he retired wealthy, dying 1967 in New England. Personal life turbulent—four marriages, American citizenship in 1939.

Filmography: The Invisible Man (1933)—voice of madness; Crime Without Passion (1934)—early lead; The Man Who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo (1935)—suave thief; Anthony Adverse (1936)—Oscar-nom villain; Stolen Holiday (1937)—romantic lead; The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)—Prince John; Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)—Oscar-nom antagonist; The Sea Hawk (1940)—Spanish don; The Invisible Man Returns (1940)—sequel voice; Here Comes Mr. Jordan (1941)—celestial messenger; Kings Row (1942)—tormented surgeon; Casablanca (1942)—iconic Renault; Phantom of the Opera (1943)—disfigured diva; Notorious (1946)—spy intrigue; Deception (1946)—jealous conductor; The Unsuspected (1947)—film noir schemer; The Passionate Friends (1949)—emotional drama; Lawrence of Arabia (1962)—finale Dryden. Over 60 films, Rains epitomised sophisticated menace.

Explore more mythic horrors in the HORRITCA archives—uncover the monsters that lurk in cinema’s shadows.

Bibliography

Curtis, J. (1983) James Whale: A New World of Gods and Monsters. Faber & Faber.

Frayling, C. (2014) Vampyres: Genesis and Resurrection: From the Cinema of Tod Browning to Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Wallflower Press.

Glut, D.F. (1977) The Frankenstein Catalog. McFarland.

Hutchinson, S. (2021) The Invisible Man: Leigh Whannell on Reimagining a Classic. Empire Online. Available at: https://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/invisible-man-leigh-whannell-interview/ (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Mank, G.W. (1998) Hollywood’s Hellfire Club: The Misadventures of John Huston, Errol Flynn, et al.. McFarland.

Pratt, D. (2015) Claude Rains: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference. McFarland.

Riefe, B. (2020) Elisabeth Moss and Leigh Whannell on Gaslighting and The Invisible Man. The Hollywood Reporter. Available at: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/invisible-man-elisabeth-moss-leigh-whannell-gaslighting-1284565/ (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Skal, D.J. (1993) The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. W.W. Norton.

Tudor, A. (1989) Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie. Basil Blackwell.

Wells, H.G. (1897) The Invisible Man. Pearson’s Magazine.