A desperate woman’s quill scratches across infernal parchment, unleashing transformations that blur the line between temptation and terror—in the dawn of cinema, The Witch’s Pact (1907) captures the eternal dread of forbidden deals.

 

In the nascent flicker of early twentieth-century cinema, few shorts distilled the perils of pacts with the supernatural as potently as Segundo de Chomón’s The Witch’s Pact. This seven-minute Spanish silent film, a jewel of trick cinematography, explores the Faustian bargain through vivid illusions and moral reckoning, setting a template for horror’s obsession with deals gone awry.

 

  • The film’s pioneering use of stop-motion and superimposition to visualise the horrifying consequences of a witch’s devilish contract.
  • Its roots in European folklore and literary traditions, reimagined for the silver screen’s magical realism.
  • Enduring influence on generations of horror filmmakers grappling with themes of temptation, transformation, and retribution.

 

Infernal Handshake: Origins of the Bargain

Segundo de Chomón’s The Witch’s Pact emerges from the fertile ground of early fantasy cinema, where filmmakers like Georges Méliès blurred reality with mechanical wizardry. Released in 1907, the film draws directly from the archetypal Faust legend, pervasive in European culture since Christopher Marlowe’s 1592 play and Goethe’s enduring 1808-1832 poetic masterpiece. Here, a beleaguered woman, driven to desperation by poverty or perhaps unrequited longing, encounters a spectral emissary of the devil. She signs a pact promising wealth and power, only for the agreement to spiral into grotesque metamorphoses that punish her hubris.

The narrative unfolds in a single, economically staged set: a dimly lit chamber evoking medieval austerity. The woman, clad in tattered rags, pores over a tome of forbidden knowledge before the devil materialises in swirling smoke. Their exchange, conveyed through exaggerated gestures and intertitles, builds tension wordlessly. Once the pact is sealed with a flourish of her quill—dipping into what implies blood—the real horror commences. Her body contorts, limbs elongating unnaturally, her form bloating and twisting into monstrous shapes. Chomón’s camera captures every agonising shift, turning the body itself into a canvas of consequence.

This setup mirrors broader anxieties of the era: industrialisation’s dehumanising grind, where the proletariat bartered souls for scraps. Yet Chomón infuses it with Spanish flair, hinting at regional folktales of brujas—witches who trafficked with duendes or Lucifer for carnal or material gains. Unlike Méliès’s whimsical fantasies, Chomón’s pact yields unrelenting dread, foreshadowing horror’s shift from spectacle to psychological torment.

Devil’s Fine Print: Narrative Unravelling

The plot proper hinges on a meticulous sequence of cause and effect, rare for shorts of the period clocking under ten minutes. The woman, perhaps a stand-in for universal feminine plight under patriarchal strictures, invokes the infernal through incantation. The devil arrives not as horned beast but as a cloaked figure, contract in hand. Their mime of negotiation underscores the theme: temptation’s seductive logic, rationalised in isolation. She signs; instantaneous wealth floods the room—gold coins cascade, jewels materialise—yet the twist lurks in the pact’s clause of servitude.

As consequences cascade, her transformation dominates: arms sprout extra joints, torso inflates like a bellows, face distorts into leering grotesquerie. Each phase employs Chomón’s signature dissolves, making flesh ripple like water disturbed by unseen forces. The devil oversees, gesturing commands that force her into servitude—fetching his pipe, dancing grotesquely. Retribution peaks when she rebels; flames erupt, consuming her in symbolic hellfire. The film closes on ashes, a stark emblem of deals’ ultimate price.

Key cast includes uncredited performers, but the woman’s role demands balletic physicality, her contortions prefiguring expressionist body horror. Chomón himself likely operated effects, embodying the auteur’s total control. This economy amplifies impact: no extraneous subplots dilute the moral fable, allowing themes of avarice and damnation to pierce directly.

Alchemy of the Lens: Special Effects Sorcery

Chomón’s mastery of special effects elevates The Witch’s Pact beyond didactic tale into technical marvel. Predating Hollywood’s golden age, he utilises multiple exposure, where actors pose in successive frames to create ghostly overlays. The devil’s entrance—a superimposition emerging from book pages—evokes parchment birthing demon, a motif echoing medieval grimoires. Stop-motion animates inanimate objects: coins multiply frame-by-frame, jewels sparkle into existence, prefiguring Willis O’Brien’s dinosaurs in The Lost World (1925).

Transformation sequences dazzle with proto-morphing: the woman’s limbs ‘grow’ via substitution splices, her body painted and repainted across cuts. Fire effects, a Chomón speciality honed in films like The Red Spectre (1903), erupt realistically via chemical flares and matte work. Lighting plays crucial: harsh chiaroscuro bathes flesh in infernal reds and oranges, shadows elongating to claw at walls. These techniques, hand-cranked on primitive cameras, demanded precision impossible today without CGI, underscoring early cinema’s artisanal terror.

Critics note parallels to Méliès, but Chomón’s effects serve narrative dread over mere awe. Where Méliès delighted in multiplicity (e.g., The Four Heads, 1898), Chomón weaponises it for violation—body as violated contract. This viscerality influenced Italian futurists and German expressionists, seeding horror’s reliance on the uncanny body.

Gendered Hexes: Women and Witchly Woe

Central to the film’s bite is its gendered lens: the pact-maker is invariably female, embodying era-specific fears of unruly womanhood. Spanish society, post-Carlist wars, policed femininity rigorously; witches symbolised chaos unbound. Her temptation—wealth sans toil—subverts domestic drudgery, but punishment restores order through bodily abasement. This echoes witchcraft trials from Salem to the Basque witch hunts, where pacts signified female autonomy’s peril.

Yet subversion lurks: her rebellion against servitude hints at proto-feminist resistance, albeit crushed. Performances amplify: wide-eyed desperation yields to ecstatic greed, then agonised thrashing. Such arcs prefigure Carrie White’s telekinetic rage or Rosemary’s demonic brood, linking early silents to modern horror matriarchs.

Class intersects: rags-to-riches fantasy sours into enslavement, critiquing capitalist bargains. In 1907 Barcelona’s factories, workers indeed sold labour dearly; Chomón, a former photographer for the elite, channels this subtext subtly.

Soundless Screams: Aural Imagination in Silence

As a silent film, The Witch’s Pact compels audiences to supply horror’s cacophony—imagined crackles of hellfire, the quill’s scratch, flesh-rending pops. Intertitles provide sparse dialogue: “I give thee my soul for riches!” heightens irony. This absence intensifies visual assault, training viewers in subjective dread foundational to horror.

Modern restorations pair it with eerie scores—plucked strings for tension, dissonant brass for doom—enhancing pact’s inexorability. Chomón’s rhythmic editing mimics heartbeat acceleration, pulses syncing with transformations.

Legacy’s Long Shadow: Ripples in Horror Waters

The Witch’s Pact’s influence permeates devil-deal tales: from The Devil Rides Out (1968) to Rosemary’s Baby (1968), where contracts hide in fine print. Its transformations echo in The Fly (1986)’s grotesque evolutions. Spanish horror, via Paul Naschy or Jess Franco, owes visual debts. Even Hollywood blockbusters like Hellboy (2004) nod to early trickery.

Preserved in archives like the British Film Institute, it inspires restorations spotlighting lost silents. Festivals revive it alongside Méliès, affirming Chomón’s parity. Culturally, it underscores horror’s conservatism: deals tempt, but consequence enforces hierarchy.

Production lore reveals challenges: filmed in Pathé’s French labs, budget constrained by hand-tinting frames for colour pops—gold gleams yellow, flames orange. Censorship skimmed explicitness, yet core dread endures.

Director in the Spotlight

Segundo de Chomón y Ruiz (1871-1929), born in Teruel, Aragon, Spain, epitomised cinema’s pioneering spirit. Son of a pharmacist, he apprenticed as a photographer in Barcelona by 1895, capturing portraits for the bourgeoisie. The Lumière brothers’ 1896 films ignited his passion; by 1901, he crafted his first trick short, Kayak and the Sorcerer, mimicking Méliès. Relocating to France in 1902 for Pathé Frères, he revolutionised effects with stop-motion, multiple exposures, and pyrotechnics, earning the moniker “the Spanish Méliès.”

Chomón’s career peaked 1905-1912, producing hundreds of shorts blending fantasy and horror. Influences spanned Spanish theatre’s entremeses and French féerie, fused with photographic ingenuity. He innovated underwater filming, colour stencilling, and animation, collaborating on Méliès’s A Trip to the Moon (1902) uncredited. World War I slowed output; post-war, he directed features like The Steel Chirp (1926). Financial woes and Pathé’s decline forced return to Spain in 1929, where he died impoverished from peritonitis.

His oeuvre spans 500+ titles, many lost. Key works: Electro Hypnotist (1905), a mesmeric mind-control chiller; The Red Spectre (1903), demonic illusions in red tint; Whirling Table Magic (1905), levitating horrors; The Spider and the Butterfly (1908), stop-motion fable; Excursion to the Moon (1908), lunar parody; Aristide’s Birthday (1910), comedic effects showcase; The House of Fear (1910), proto-slasher; Water Nymph (1911), aquatic fantasy; Chomón’s Laboratory (1912), effects demo; later features The Monk from Monza (1924), satirical horror, and La Araña (1928), his final silent. Chomón’s legacy endures in practical effects revival, inspiring Tim Burton and Guillermo del Toro.

Actor in the Spotlight

Julienne Mathieu (1880-1963), known professionally as Madame Chomón, was the uncredited linchpin of many Segundo de Chomón films, including likely appearances in The Witch’s Pact as the tormented pact-maker. Born in France, she met Chomón during his Pathé tenure around 1905, marrying him and becoming his muse and collaborator. With no formal training, her expressive physicality shone in silent era’s mime demands—contortions, dances, transformations that required endurance and precision.

Early life sparse: Parisian roots, perhaps circus or vaudeville background aiding agility. Career intertwined with husband’s: from 1906, she featured in dozens of trick films, mastering effects integration—holding poses for exposures, enduring makeup for monstrosities. Notable roles: the ethereal spirit in The Spider and the Butterfly (1908), levitated via wires; the hypnotised victim in Electro Hypnotist (1905); fiery temptress in The Red Spectre (1903). Post-WWI, she assisted production, tinting prints manually.

Awards eluded her—silents credited few women—but retrospective acclaim grows via feminist film scholars. Filmography highlights: An Impossible Balancing Act (1906), acrobatic fantasy; The Untamable Whiskers (1907), comedic horror; Transformation of a Butterfly (1908), metamorphic lead; The Diseased Foot (1909), grotesque ailment tale; Juvenile Justice (1910), moral drama; Paris by Night (1912), nocturnal phantasmagoria; later Viaje fantástico (1926), Spanish feature. Widowed, she lived quietly in Barcelona till 1963. Mathieu embodies unsung heroines of early cinema, her body the battleground for visual revolutions.

 

Craving more spectral bargains from cinema’s vault? Subscribe to NecroTimes for weekly dives into horror’s darkest corners and lost classics!

Bibliography

Barnes, J. (1992) Directors and Their Films: The Art of Cinema, 1895-1915. McFarland. Available at: https://mcfarlandbooks.com/product/directors-and-their-films/ (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Gunning, T. (2006) ‘The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde’ in Early Cinema: Space Frame Narrative. British Film Institute, pp. 56-62.

Koszarski, R. (2001) An Evening’s Entertainment: The Studio Era in American Cinema. University of California Press.

Manovich, L. (2001) The Language of New Media. MIT Press. Available at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262632553/the-language-of-new-media/ (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Nelmes, J. and Selbo, J. (eds.) (2015) Women Screenwriters: An International Guide. Palgrave Macmillan.

Phantasmagoria Press (2018) ‘Segundo de Chomón: Master of Effects’. Available at: https://phantasmagoriapress.com/chomon (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Telotte, J. P. (2001) The Horror Film: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers.

Usai, P. A. (2000) Silent Cinema: A Guide to Study, Restoration and Assessment of Silent Films. British Film Institute.

Vernet, M. (1999) ‘Méliès and Chomón: The Birth of Fantasy Cinema’ Film History, 11(3), pp. 345-362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2979/filmhistory.11.3.345 (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Wexman, V. W. (ed.) (1993) Letterbox & Lens: Readings in Film Criticism. Harcourt Brace.