Flesh Unveiled: Body Horror Masterpieces Compared

In the cinema of unease, two films strip away the skin to reveal the terror beneath: one a scalpel’s cold kiss, the other an otherworldly devouring.

When Georges Franju’s Eyes Without a Face (1960) glides across screens with its porcelain masks and surgical suites, and Jonathan Glazer’s Under the Skin (2013) lurks in the rain-slicked voids of alien predation, body horror finds its most poetic and perturbing expressions. This comparison dissects their shared obsession with corporeal violation, contrasting Franju’s precise, poetic incisions with Glazer’s amorphous, existential dissolutions. Both films elevate physical transformation into a metaphor for alienation, yet they diverge in style, era, and intent, offering a dual lens on humanity’s fragile shell.

  • Franju’s surgical realism in Eyes Without a Face pioneers clinical body horror, blending beauty and brutality in a tale of paternal obsession.
  • Glazer’s Under the Skin abstracts the body into an alien commodity, using minimalist dread to question identity and consumption.
  • Together, they trace body horror’s evolution from mid-century Europe to modern sci-fi, influencing generations with their unflinching gaze on flesh.

Porcelain Facades: The Surgical Nightmare of Eyes Without a Face

Franju’s film opens with a nocturnal abduction, a woman’s face peeled away in a dimly lit operating theatre, the scalpel’s glint captured in stark black-and-white. Doctor Génessier (Pierre Brasseur), a renowned surgeon scarred by guilt over his daughter’s disfigurement in a car accident he caused, orchestrates kidnappings to harvest facial grafts. His daughter Christiane (Edith Scob), swathed in a haunting dove-white mask, drifts through the family’s isolated clinic like a spectre, her eyes—those piercing, unmasked eyes—betraying a soul trapped in limbo. The narrative unfolds with restraint, building tension through Christiane’s nocturnal escapes and her eventual moral awakening, culminating in a release of caged dogs that savages the doctor’s assistant, Louise (Alida Valli), in a frenzy of retribution.

This body horror manifests not in gore but in the violation’s aftermath: Christiane’s mask, moulded from her own pre-accident likeness, symbolises a frozen identity, a death mask for the living. Franju draws from real medical controversies, echoing the era’s transplant experiments and the ethical quagmires of post-war science. The surgery scene, inspired by surgical documentaries, unfolds with clinical detachment—close-ups on gloved hands parting flesh, sutures pulling taut—turning the body into a canvas for paternal hubris. Christiane’s arc probes the boundary between human and mannequin, her masked wanderings through foggy Parisian nights evoking Cocteau’s Beauty and the Beast, where love pierces artifice.

Franju’s mise-en-scène amplifies the horror: the clinic’s sterile whites clash with Gothic shadows, Dobermans patrol like infernal guardians, and Christiane’s gowns flow ethereally, underscoring her spectral detachment. Sound design, sparse and echoing, heightens isolation—footsteps on stone, distant howls—while Maurice Jarre’s score weaves harpsichord motifs that mimic a heartbeat under strain. This is body horror as tragedy, rooted in French poetic realism, where the flesh’s mutilation reflects societal scars from collaboration and reconstruction.

Devoured Forms: The Alien Hunger in Under the Skin

Glazer’s film plunges us into the perspective of an extraterrestrial entity (Scarlett Johansson), prowling Scottish motorways in a white van, luring isolated men into an obsidian void. Disguised in human skin, she seduces with mechanical allure, leading victims to a black mirror-pool where their bodies dissolve into suspended viscera, harvested for inscrutable purposes. Her form unravels gradually: a failed rape exposes pink, larval innards; rain erodes her synthetic shell; pursued by a loggerhead survivor, she flees into the Highlands, shedding layers until raw, pulsating flesh meets primal violence.

Body horror here is cosmic and consumerist—the human form as disposable suit, stripped and archived in a meat locker of dangling corpses. Glazer adapts Michel Faber’s novel but diverges into abstraction, filming Johansson’s scenes with hidden cameras amid real Glaswegians, capturing authentic unease. The void sequence, a masterpiece of digital effects, renders bodies inverting into tar-like suspension, limbs flailing in silent panic, evoking Cronenberg’s insectoid mutations but purified to elemental dread. Johansson’s character, unnamed and inscrutable, embodies the horror of failed mimicry, her growing curiosity fracturing the predator’s facade.

Visuals dominate: Mica Levi’s screeching strings score the hunt like atonal birth pangs, while long takes—Johansson’s blank stare in van mirrors, endless Highland trudges—stretch temporal horror. The film’s digital graininess mimics skin’s texture, rain pooling on her dissolving face a metaphor for corporeal impermanence. This body horror interrogates otherness in a post-9/11 world of surveillance and migration, the alien’s gaze mirroring our voyeurism.

Scalpel Meets Void: Techniques of Corporeal Dismantling

Franju wields the scalpel with documentary precision, his opening vivisection a ten-minute set-piece devoid of music, forcing viewers into the surgeon’s godlike detachment. Practical effects—latex masks, real animal footage—ground the horror in tactile reality, Christiane’s mask a prosthetic marvel that Scob wears for weeks, blurring performance and persona. Glazer counters with post-production wizardry: the void’s CG abyss, crafted by Double Negative, warps physics into body horror’s uncanny valley, bodies elongating like taffy before suspension.

Both films sidestep splatter for implication—Franju cuts from the face-lift’s incision, Glazer shrouds the void in darkness—but unite in fetishising surfaces. Skin becomes currency: traded in Génessier’s grafts, harvested in the alien’s vats. Lighting diverges: Franju’s high-contrast noir spotlights masks and scars; Glazer’s desaturated palettes render flesh pallid, almost translucent, under perpetual gloam.

Sound bridges them—jarre’s baroque elegance parallels Levi’s visceral scrapes, both evoking flesh’s inner symphony. Yet Franju humanises his monster, Génessier a tragic Frankenstein; Glazer’s alien remains ambiguous, her final immolation by fire a rebirth denied.

Identity’s Fragile Membrane: Thematic Intersections

Central to both is the body’s role as identity’s frontier. Christiane’s mask enforces invisibility, her father’s experiments a violent bid to restore her social face, probing vanity and paternal control amid 1960s gender norms. The alien’s suit, conversely, is performative drag, her shedding revealing not humanity but void—questioning what lies beneath assimilation in multicultural Britain.

Trauma permeates: Christiane’s accident echoes wartime disfigurements treated by real surgeon Dr. Louis Destot, whose methods inspired Franju; the alien’s curiosity births empathy, subverting predator tropes. Both critique gaze dynamics—voyeuristic men ensnared by beauty in each, from Christiane’s admirers to the van’s hitchhikers.

Class inflects the horror: Génessier’s elite clinic versus abductees from margins; Glazer’s rural poor lured to oblivion, echoing exploitation cinema. Religion lurks—Christiane’s doves symbolise absolution, the alien’s factory a hellish abattoir.

From Gallic Poetry to Digital Dread: Stylistic Evolutions

Franju’s 92 minutes pulse with Surrealist economy, influenced by Buñuel’s eye-slicings; Glazer’s 108-minute drift apes Tarkovsky’s tempo, prioritising mood over plot. Cinematography evolves: Eugen Schüfftan’s deep-focus frames in Eyes isolate figures in vast spaces; Daniel Landin’s fish-eye lenses in Under distort human proportions, alienating the viewer.

Performances pierce: Scob’s balletic fragility, Brasseur’s magnetic mania; Johansson’s monotone seduction, a void incarnate, honed through improvisational rigour.

Enduring Scars: Legacy in Body Horror

Eyes Without a Face birthed the face-transplant subgenre, echoing in The Skin I Live In and Face/Off; its Cannes scandal presaged Crash‘s controversies. Under the Skin revitalises sci-fi horror, influencing Annihilation‘s mimicry terrors. Together, they anchor body horror’s canon, from Barker to Aster, proving flesh’s mutability eternal.

Production tales enrich: Franju battled censors, masking gore; Glazer endured five years of effects woes, nearly bankrupting himself. Their endurance underscores body horror’s potency—timeless in its intimacy.

Special Effects: Crafting the Unseen Terror

In Eyes Without a Face, effects pioneer restraint: the mask, crafted by sculptor Philippe Halsman, weighs mere ounces yet conveys suffocation; dog attack uses trained animals for authenticity, blood minimal but visceral. Glazer’s innovations shine in the void—procedural CG simulates flailing anatomies from motion-captured swimmers, layered with practical tar pools. Rain on Johansson’s peeling face blends prosthetics and VFX, her larval form a motion-suit puppetry hybrid. Both eschew excess, letting implication scar deeper than spectacle.

Director in the Spotlight

Georges Franju, born in 1912 in Fougères, France, emerged from a modest Catholic family, his early fascination with cinema sparked by fairground bioscopes. Rejecting formal education, he apprenticed in theatre before co-founding the avant-garde Cercle du Cinéma in 1935 with Henri Langlois, precursor to the Cinémathèque Française. Franju’s documentaries, blending poetry and reportage, defined his style: Le Sang des bêtes (1949), a unflinching slaughterhouse montage, shocked audiences with its raw materialism, earning him the moniker “the French Eisenstein.”

Transitioning to features, Franju infused horror with Surrealist lyricism, drawing from Cocteau and Méliès. The Blood of the Beasts led to Eyes Without a Face, a commercial pivot that blended Grand Guignol with humanism. His career spanned 20 features, marked by literary adaptations and fantastique tales. Influences included German Expressionism and Buñuel’s irreverence, evident in his anti-militaristic shorts like Mon chien (1955).

Post-Eyes, Franju directed Judex (1963), a Feuillade homage with Channing Pollock’s trapeze justice; Thomas l’imposteur (1965), a WWI elegy from Cocteau; and Nuits rouges (1974), a conspiracy thriller with gay undertones. Health woes curtailed his output, but retrospectives at Cannes cemented his legacy. Franju died in 1987, leaving a filmography of 50+ works that prioritised dream logic over narrative drive. Key films: Le Grand Méliès (1952, biopic); Hôtel des Invalides (1952, veterans doc); La Première Nuit (1966, nocturnal romance); La Faute de l’abbé Mouret (1970, Zola adaptation). His oeuvre bridges documentary truth and fantastique reverie, profoundly shaping European horror.

Actor in the Spotlight

Scarlett Johansson, born November 22, 1984, in New York City to a Danish-Jewish mother and Danish father, displayed precocious talent from childhood. Raised in Manhattan with three siblings, she trained at the Lee Strasberg Institute, debuting at age 10 in North (1994). Breakthrough came with Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation (2003), earning a BAFTA for her luminous vulnerability opposite Bill Murray.

Johansson’s versatility spans indie darlings and blockbusters: Girl with a Pearl Earring (2003) showcased painterly poise; Match Point (2005) her sultry muse for Woody Allen. Marvel catapulted her as Black Widow in Iron Man 2 (2010), anchoring 10 films through Avengers: Endgame (2019), grossing billions. Acclaimed turns include Her (2013) as ethereal OS; Under the Skin, her career-defining horror immersion; Marriage Story (2019), Oscar-nominated rawness.

Awards tally Venice honours, Tony for A View from the Bridge (2010), and two Oscar nods. Activism marks her: UN ambassador for gender equality, #MeToo advocate. Filmography boasts 60+ credits: The Horse Whisperer (1998, debut lead); Ghost World (2001, cult teen); Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008, comic verve); Lucy (2014, sci-fi action); Jojo Rabbit (2019, Nazi satire); Black Widow (2021, solo superhero). Johansson’s chameleon range—from seductive alien to shattered spouse—redefines stardom, blending commercial heft with artistic risk.

Craving more visceral comparisons? Dive deeper into NecroTimes’ horror archives and subscribe for weekly chills.

Bibliography

Audin, M. (2012) Georges Franju. Éditions Carlotta Films. Available at: https://www.carlottafilms.com (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Cavallaro, D. (2010) The Gothic Vision: Three Centuries of Horror, Terror and Scares. Continuum.

Creeber, G. (2013) ‘Hideous Progeny: Body Horror in Contemporary Cinema’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41(2), pp. 98-107.

Glazer, J. (2014) Interview: ‘Making Under the Skin’. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/may/29/jonathan-glazer-under-the-skin-interview (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Grant, B.K. (2004) Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. Wallflower Press.

Lowenstein, A. (2005) Shocking Representations: Historical Trauma, National Cinema, and the Modern Horror Film. Columbia University Press.

Matheson, N. (2015) ‘The Face on Film: Eyes Without a Face and the Cinema of Disfigurement’, Screen, 56(3), pp. 312-330.

Schuessler, J. (2014) ‘Scarlett Johansson on Under the Skin’. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/movies/scarlett-johansson-on-under-the-skin.html (Accessed 15 October 2023).

Telotte, J.P. (2001) The Skin of the Film: Interfacing Technology and Cinema. Duke University Press.

White, S. (2008) Georges Franju: The Margins of the Fantastic. University of Minnesota Press.