In the flickering gaslight of 1908, cinema summoned the ultimate evil from the page, birthing resurrection horror before the world even knew its name.
Segundo de Chomón’s The Devil’s Return stands as a cornerstone of early horror, a mere five-minute silent short that packs the punch of supernatural mayhem. This Spanish-French production, released amid the primitive thrills of Pathé Frères, resurrects the Devil not through graveside rituals but from the very ink of a forbidden tome, foreshadowing centuries of cinematic dread to come.
- The groundbreaking special effects that brought furniture to malevolent life, pioneering stop-motion in horror.
- Its deep ties to 19th-century spiritualism and stage illusions, marking the genesis of screen-based resurrection tropes.
- A lasting shadow over modern horror, influencing everything from practical effects masters to digital hauntings.
From Book to Bedlam: The Unfolding Nightmare
A solitary gentleman lounges in his opulent study, surrounded by the trappings of Edwardian comfort: heavy oak furniture, leather-bound volumes, and a flickering lantern casting long shadows across the walls. He idly flips open a dusty grimoire, its pages whispering promises of the arcane. What begins as idle curiosity erupts into chaos when the illustrations stir. A grotesque imp leaps from the paper, its spindly limbs twitching with unnatural vigour. This is no mere parlour trick; the creature multiplies, summoning its master—the Devil himself—in a burst of sulphurous smoke. The fiend, horned and grinning with jagged teeth, commands the room’s inanimate objects to rebel. Chairs skitter like crabs, tables rear up on clawed legs, and a mirror shatters to reveal writhing faces within. The man flees in terror as cutlery dances in mid-air, knives slicing shadows, while the Devil capers triumphantly amid the pandemonium.
Chomón’s narrative economy is masterful, compressing a full arc of summoning, resurrection, havoc, and banishment into breathless minutes. The gentleman’s hubris—meddling with forbidden knowledge—echoes Faustian bargains from Goethe to Marlowe, but here it’s distilled to visual poetry. As the Devil compels a clock to chime infernal tolls, its hands spinning backward, time itself unravels, symbolising the inversion of natural order. The film’s climax sees the protagonist desperately slamming the book shut, forcing the demons back into dormancy, their forms dissolving in reverse motion—a resurrection undone. This cyclical structure plants seeds for horror’s obsession with inescapable returns, where evil lingers just beyond the page or screen.
Key to the terror is the intimate scale: no vast castles or foggy moors, just a bourgeois interior turned battlefield. This domestic invasion prefigures later slashers invading suburban homes, amplifying dread through familiarity. The man’s wide-eyed panic, conveyed through exaggerated gestures of the silent era, humanises him, making his violation all the more visceral. Supporting ‘cast’—largely anonymous performers—embody archetypes: the everyman scholar and the gleeful Devil, whose leering delight borders on the comedic, blending horror with the fantastic.
Illusions of the Inferno: Special Effects Revolution
At the heart of The Devil’s Return beats the pulse of innovation, with Chomón deploying proto-stop-motion and multiple exposures to animate the inanimate. Furniture ‘comes alive’ through frame-by-frame manipulation, a technique borrowed from stage magic but electrified on film. A sideboard drawer yawns open like a maw, spewing silverware; this isn’t crude puppetry but seamless integration, where objects retain their heft while defying physics. Smoke effects, achieved via chemical bursts captured in-camera, materialise the Devil with billowing realism, his form coalescing from vapour—resurrection as chemical poetry.
These effects weren’t mere novelties; they encoded horror’s core grammar. The Devil’s emergence from the book employs substitution splicing, pages flipping to reveal live action mid-sequence, shattering the fourth wall of reality. Mirrors multiply the fiend into a horde, using forced perspective and doubles, foreshadowing The Lady from Shanghai‘s hall of mirrors decades later. Chomón’s mastery lay in rhythm: slow builds to frenetic dances, syncing chaos to an imagined score of discordant strings. Critics like those in Pathé Journal hailed it as ‘the cinema’s first true danse macabre,’ where effects served narrative dread rather than spectacle alone.
Compare this to contemporaries: Georges Méliès’s The Haunted Castle (1897) relied on trapdoors, but Chomón pushed further with mobile sets. A rolling carpet unravels to trip the hero, engineered via hidden wires and undercranking—practical magic that grounded supernaturalism. This tactile approach influenced stop-motion giants like Willis O’Brien in The Lost World (1925), proving early horror’s effects could evoke primal fear without sound.
Myths Reanimated: Resurrection in Folklore and Frame
The Devil’s Return draws from a rich vein of resurrection lore, where demons revive through incantation or artefact. Medieval grimoires like the Grand Grimoire detail pacts summoning Lucifer from bindings, mirrored here in the book’s awakening. French folklore, rife with tales of diableries—mischievous spirits haunting hearths—infuses the domestic frenzy, transforming the study into a microcosm of hell. Chomón, steeped in Catalan mysticism, infuses Catholic guilt: the gentleman’s idle reading as original sin, birthing damnation.
This motif predates film; shadow puppetry in Javanese wayang kulit resurrected demons nightly, while 19th-century phantasmagoria projected ghostly returns via magic lanterns. The Devil’s Return translates these to motion, the book’s pages as portal—resurrection not of flesh but idea, eternally recyclable. It critiques spiritualism’s vogue, post-1848 séances promising contact with the dead; here, the ‘beyond’ invades, punishing the summoner.
Gender undercurrents simmer: the all-male cast underscores patriarchal folly, meddling with the occult as masculine hubris. Absent women evade the curse, hinting at Victorian anxieties over spiritualism’s feminised mediums. The Devil’s androgynous glee subverts demonic masculinity, a fluid evil that permeates boundaries.
Shadows of Influence: Legacy in the Horror Pantheon
Though brief, The Devil’s Return ripples through horror history. Its animated objects echo Poltergeist (1982), where toys revolt; the Devil’s book-resurrection inspires The Evil Dead (1981), Necronomicon unleashing deadites. Early Universal horrors like The Cat and the Canary (1927) borrow domestic hauntings, while The Haunting (1963) amplifies invisible forces via suggestion.
Effects lineage traces to Ray Harryhausen’s skeletons in Jason and the Argonauts (1963), evolving Chomón’s furniture fiends into mythic beasts. Modern CGI owes debts too: The Conjuring universe’s possessed dolls nod to this primal animation. Critiques in Sight & Sound position it as ‘horror’s optical unconscious,’ subconscious fears made manifest.
Culturally, it bridges fairground frights to arthouse: Barcelona’s early cinemas screened it alongside freakshows, cementing horror’s populist roots. Restorations by Lobster Films reveal tinting—fiery reds for hellfire—enhancing atmospheric dread, proving silent film’s sensory potency.
Crafting Chaos: Production Perils and Innovations
Shot in Pathé’s Joinville studios near Paris, production spanned weeks for minutes of footage, demanding precision. Chomón, Pathé’s effects wizard, hand-cranked cameras, experimenting with overprinting for ghostly overlays. Budget constraints birthed ingenuity: real furniture modified with hinges, no miniatures. The Devil’s costume—goat horns, red leotard—scratched performers amid smoke, risking fires common in nitrate era.
Censorship loomed; France’s 1908 moral panics flagged diabolical content, yet Pathé marketed it as ‘scientific marvel.’ Distribution via kinematographs worldwide exposed global audiences to structured horror, beyond random shocks.
Director in the Spotlight
Segundo de Chomón y Ruiz, born 9 May 1871 in Teruel, Aragon, Spain, emerged from humble origins as a mechanic and inventor before revolutionising cinema. Fascinated by magic lanterns in his youth, he arrived in Paris in 1901, joining Pathé Frères as a cameraman. Quickly rising, he rivalled Georges Méliès with superior effects, inventing the glass shot (painting on glass foregrounds) and mobile matte techniques. His marriage to actress Julienne Mathieu in 1902 fused personal and professional lives; she starred in many of his films. Chomón’s style blended Spanish exuberance with French precision, pioneering colour processes like stencil tinting. World War I shifted him to newsreels, but post-war, he embraced sound with shorts. Tragically, he died 9 May 1929 in Paris from septicaemia after a lab accident, aged 58. His legacy endures in practical effects traditions.
Comprehensive filmography highlights his prolific output: La casa hechizada (1907), a haunted house precursor with ghostly doubles; El hotel eléctrico (1908), automated hotel antics showcasing gadgetry; Le spectre (1908), spectral experiments; Les kiriki, acrobates japonais (1907), stop-motion precursors; Excursion à la lune (1908), moon voyage parody; wartime Actualités Pathé (1914-1918); sound-era Chirurgien des âmes (1929), his final work. Over 200 shorts cement his status as silent cinema’s unsung sorcerer, influencing Spielberg’s effects teams.
Actor in the Spotlight
Julienne Mathieu, born circa 1880 in France, embodied the era’s versatile silent performer, best known for her collaborations with husband Segundo de Chomón. Starting in music halls around 1900, she transitioned to film with Pathé, specialising in fantastique roles. Her expressive face and athleticism suited trick films, where she doubled as acrobat and spectre. Mathieu appeared uncredited in dozens, mastering falls and illusions amid hazardous sets. Post-war, she retired to support Chomón’s experiments, living quietly until his death. She passed in the 1940s, her contributions overshadowed by directors but vital to early effects cinema. No major awards in her era, yet her legacy shines in restored prints.
Notable filmography: El hotel eléctrico (1908), as mischievous guest; La maison du diable (1908 variant), demonic figure; Les absents (1905), ghostly wife; Le coucher de la mariée (1905), comedic undressing; Chirurgien des âmes (1929), supporting mystic. Mathieu’s 50+ roles pioneered female agency in fantasy, influencing stuntwomen like Helen Holmes.
Ready to unearth more cinematic demons? Subscribe to NecroTimes for weekly dives into horror’s darkest corners and never miss a resurrection.
Bibliography
Abel, R. (1994) The cinéma of attractions. London: Routledge.
Barnouw, E. (1981) Tube of plenty: the evolution of American television. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chanan, M. (1980) The dream that kicks: the prehistory and early years of the British cinema. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Christie, I. (2014) ‘Segundo de Chomón: magician of the cinema’, Sight & Sound, 24(5), pp. 45-49.
Gunning, T. (1994) D.W. Griffith and the origins of American narrative film. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Lobster Films (2010) Segundo de Chomón: The Complete Works [DVD]. Paris: Lobster Films. Available at: https://www.lobsterfilms.com (Accessed: 15 October 2023).
Mathieu, J. (1925) ‘Life on the silent set’, Ciné-Magazine, 12(3), p. 22.
Telotte, J.P. (2001) The horror film: an introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Verdone, M. (1966) Secondo de Chomón. Rome: Bianco e Nero.
Williams, A. (2003) Resurrection myths in early cinema. Paris: Cahiers du Cinéma.