Madness Divine: Repulsion and Saint Maud’s Duel Over Faith and the Fractured Mind

Two women, consumed by inner visions – one fleeing the profane, the other chasing the sacred – plunge into horrors that blur the line between devotion and derangement.

In the shadowed corridors of psychological horror, few films capture the torment of faith’s double edge as acutely as Roman Polanski’s Repulsion (1965) and Rose Glass’s Saint Maud (2019). Both dissect the human psyche through protagonists gripped by religious impulses, revealing how belief can warp reality into nightmare. This comparison uncovers their shared obsessions with isolation, hallucination, and spiritual ecstasy turned profane, while highlighting divergent paths in style, era, and execution.

  • Faith as fracture: How religious delusion drives psychological collapse in both protagonists, from Catholic repression to evangelical zeal.
  • Cinematic sorcery: Contrasting Polanski’s austere minimalism with Glass’s visceral, body-horror inflected intensity.
  • Enduring echoes: Performances and production insights that cement these films as cornerstones of faith-tinged terror.

Unraveling Sanctuaries: The Core Nightmares

Polanski’s Repulsion centres on Carol Ledoux, a Belgian manicurist in London whose sexual aversion spirals into catatonia and violence. Catherine Deneuve portrays Carol with ethereal detachment, her wide eyes registering a world of encroaching filth. Confined to her sister’s apartment during a brief absence, Carol’s isolation amplifies her neuroses: walls seem to crack and pulse, hands grope from shadows, and rabbits rot on the table. Her Catholic upbringing, hinted through fragmented memories of a confessional priest, fuels a repulsion towards male desire, manifesting in hallucinatory assaults. The film builds to brutal murders – first her sister’s lover, then a persistent suitor – culminating in Carol’s foetal curl amid decay, a portrait of repression’s endpoint.

In stark contrast, Saint Maud follows Maud, a young nurse whose conversion after a car accident reshapes her life into pious fervour. Morfydd Clark embodies Maud’s intensity, her gaunt frame and fervent gaze dominating every frame. Caring for Amanda, a terminally ill dancer, Maud interprets bodily suffering as divine trial, leading to extreme acts: self-flagellation, prayer marathons, and visions of stigmata. Faith elevates her from mundane nurse to saint-in-waiting, but cracks emerge – Amanda’s atheism mocks her, visions intensify, and Maud’s past as alcoholic Katie resurfaces. The climax erupts in a ritualistic blaze, questioning whether transcendence or insanity prevails.

Both narratives thrive on domestic entrapment: Carol’s apartment becomes a womb of horror, walls breathing with suppressed urges; Maud’s coastal bedsit and Amanda’s home morph into crucibles of salvation. Yet where Repulsion externalises internal dread through surreal intrusions – phallic bananas, elongated corridors – Saint Maud internalises it via bodily mortification, sweat-slicked skin and bleeding feet symbolising soul’s purge. These setups ground psychological horror in faith’s terrain: Carol’s implicit guilt over purity, Maud’s explicit quest for grace.

Production contexts enrich the comparison. Repulsion, Polanski’s first English-language film, was shot in a real Pimlico flat, its claustrophobia authentic. Budget constraints forced ingenuity – decay simulated with plaster and flour – yielding raw potency. Saint Maud, Glass’s feature debut backed by A24, revels in period detail: 2019’s Britain evokes saintly hagiographies through candlelit rituals. Both leverage low-fi terror, proving faith’s madness needs no spectacle.

Faith’s Venomous Core: From Repression to Redemption

Faith in Repulsion simmers unspoken, a Catholic residue poisoning Carol’s sexuality. Flashbacks to a leering priest during confession evoke original sin’s burden, her repulsion a hysterical defence against carnality. Polanski draws from real psychological cases, like Freudian analyses of frigidity, framing faith as patriarchal cage. Carol’s inertia – staring vacantly as decay festers – mirrors monastic withdrawal, but twisted into solipsistic horror. No sermons preach; faith poisons silently, amplifying alienation in swinging London.

Saint Maud thrusts faith centre-stage, Maud’s evangelical Protestantism a bulwark against trauma. Her accident – pulling a bloody sheet from a dying patient – births rebirth as ‘Maud’, apostle to Amanda’s soul. Glass weaves Catholic iconography (stigmata, thorns) into Protestant zeal, critiquing charismatic extremes. Maud’s diary entries and prayers blur memoir and mania, echoing medieval mystics like Julian of Norwich. Faith promises agency amid nursing drudgery, yet devolves into control: forcing Amanda to knees, it’s salvation as domination.

Juxtaposed, Carol embodies faith’s negative – rejection of fleshly world – while Maud its positive – embrace via suffering. Both weaponise isolation: Carol barricades against intruders, Maud against sceptics. This duality probes religion’s psyche-sculpting power, Carol’s passive purgatory versus Maud’s active apocalypse. In era terms, 1960s sexual revolution clashes with Carol’s anachronistic piety; 2010s secularism mocks Maud’s theocracy.

Thematic depth surges in gender dynamics. Carol’s trauma likely stems from implied abuse, faith amplifying victimhood; Maud repurposes addiction into sainthood, faith empowering yet isolating women. Both films indict institutional religion: confessional voyeurism in Repulsion, prosperity gospel echoes in Maud’s miracles. Psychological horror here dissects faith not as comfort, but accelerant to breakdown.

Hallucinations Holy and Horrific

Psychological descent dominates both, faith catalysing delusion. Carol’s visions escalate organically: auditory scratches precede visual rapes, reality fraying like wallpaper. Polanski’s long takes trap viewers in her paralysis, subjective camera mimicking dissociation. Culminating in infanticidal fantasy – a hallucinated child clubbed – it evokes postpartum psychosis laced with religious guilt.

Maud’s apparitions burst feverishly: God whispers through floorboards, feet ignite in ecstasy. Glass employs fish-eye lenses and slow-motion for rapture’s distortion, blurring pain and pleasure. Her final seaside sermon, preaching to empty waves, rivals Carol’s catatonic stare – both soliloquies of the damned. Where Carol regresses to infancy, Maud ascends to martyrdom, yet both end in institutionalisation’s shadow.

Sound design amplifies psyches: Repulsion‘s dissonant piano and heartbeat throbs underscore repression’s rhythm; Saint Maud‘s choral swells and skin-squelches evoke baroque torment. Influences converge – Polanski nods to Bergman’s Through a Glass Darkly, Glass to Ken Russell’s religious grotesques – uniting in faith as mental virus.

These descents critique modernity: Carol adrift in permissive London, Maud defiant in godless Britain. Psychological horror peaks when faith fills existential voids, birthing private infernos.

Lenses of Lunacy: Visual and Auditory Assaults

Polanski’s cinematography, via Gilbert Taylor, wields black-and-white austerity: deep shadows swallow Carol, negative space mirrors voids. Hallway stretches via convex mirrors symbolise distorted desire; close-ups on Deneuve’s impassive face force empathy with emptiness. Soundscape minimal – dripping taps, buzzing flies – builds dread through absence.

Glass and Miguel Otaegui’s colour palette bursts red and gold for Maud’s visions, desaturating for reality. Handheld frenzy captures convulsions, macro shots of bloodied nails evoke Cronenbergian flesh. Score by Lydia Tarrant layers hymns with industrial noise, faith’s melody soured.

Comparison reveals evolution: Repulsion‘s static rigour suits 1960s Euro-horror precision; Saint Maud‘s kinetic verve fits post-millennial body horror. Both master mise-en-scène – rotting food as soul-rot, crucifixes as weapons – proving visuals incarnate faith’s fracture.

Influence lingers: Repulsion birthed apartment horrors like Rosemary’s Baby; Saint Maud echoes in A24’s elevated genre, like The Witch. Technical prowess elevates thematic bite.

Performances that Pierce the Soul

Deneuve’s Carol mesmerises through stillness, micro-expressions betraying turmoil. Her balletic violence – axe swings in slow grace – blends fragility and fury, Oscar-nominated poise elevating B-horror roots. Supporting Ian Hendry and Yvonne Furneaux ground absurdity in humanity.

Clark’s Maud erupts: fervent smiles crack into grimaces, physicality – hobbling on blisters – visceral. BAFTA-nominated, she channels saintly hysterics akin to Isabelle Adjani in Possession. Jennifer Ehle’s Amanda counters with wry decay, sharpening Maud’s zeal.

These turns anchor comparisons: Deneuve internalises, Clark externalises madness. Faith demands total commitment, their embodiments proving acting’s terror alchemy.

Legacy of Lingering Dread

Repulsion redefined psychological horror, influencing Jacob’s Ladder and Hereditary. Controversies – Polanski’s life mirroring themes – add layers. Saint Maud heralds Glass’s promise, its pandemic release amplifying isolation motifs. Together, they affirm faith’s peril in horror canon, warning belief’s blade cuts deepest inward.

From Polanski’s stark nihilism to Glass’s ecstatic nihilism, these films duel over divinity’s cost, leaving psyches scarred.

Director in the Spotlight: Roman Polanski

Born Raymond Liebling in 1933 Paris to Polish-Jewish parents, Roman Polanski endured WWII Krakow ghetto horrors, losing his mother to Auschwitz. Escaping to Britain then Poland, he studied at Lodz Film School, crafting shorts like Two Men and a Wardrobe (1958), absurdist tales echoing trauma. Emigrating to France and Britain, he honed craft with Knife in the Water (1962), a tense marital thriller earning Venice acclaim.

Hollywood beckoned with Repulsion (1965), launching his English phase. Cul-de-sac (1966) blended black comedy and isolation; Rosemary’s Baby (1968) mainstreamed satanic paranoia, earning Oscar nods. Tragedy struck – pregnant wife Sharon Tate murdered by Manson Family – yielding Macbeth (1971), a bloody Shakespearean plunge.

Exile followed 1977 statutory rape charge; Tess (1979) won Cesars, Pirates (1986) flopped comically. Comebacks included The Pianist (2002), Holocaust survival tale netting Best Director Oscar. Influences span Hitchcock, Buñuel, Polish surrealism; style fuses meticulous framing, moral ambiguity.

Filmography spans: The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967, gothic spoof); Chinatown (1974, neo-noir masterpiece); Frantic (1988, thriller); Bitter Moon (1992, erotic mindgames); Death and the Maiden (1994, Sigourney Weaver vehicle); The Ninth Gate (1999, occult mystery); Venus in Fur (2013, stage adaptation); Based on a True Story (2017, meta-thriller); An Officer and a Spy (2019, Dreyfus affair drama, Venice Golden Lion). Polanski, now 90, remains cinema’s provocative exile, faith and fate intertwined.

Actor in the Spotlight: Morfydd Clark

Born 24 March 1993 in Maesteg, Wales, to a nurse mother and social worker father, Morfydd Clark nurtured acting via Welsh-language youth theatre. Treorchy Comprehensive led to Drama Centre London, graduating 2015. Breakthrough: The Falling (2014), cult teen drama; TV’s Suf Sugr (2016) showcased bilingual flair.

Saint Maud (2019) exploded her profile, Clark’s raw intensity earning BAFTA Rising Star nomination, BIFA Best Actress. Hollywood followed: Galadriel in Amazon’s The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power (2022-), Oppenheimer (2023) as Jean Tatlock. Theatre triumphs: The Doll’s House (2023 West End).

Known for quiet ferocity, influences include Kate Winslet, Welsh heritage. Awards: BIFA for Saint Maud; nominations from Saturn, Fangoria. Filmography: The Man Who Invented Christmas (2017, Dickens biopic); Crawl (2019, creature feature); His Dark Materials (2019-, TV); Eternal Daughter (2022, Joanna Hogg ghost story); Damsel (2024, Netflix fantasy). At 31, Clark bridges horror and prestige, her Maud a career-defining inferno.

Craving more chills? Dive deeper into horror’s abyss – subscribe to NecroTimes today for exclusive analyses, director spotlights, and the latest genre gems straight to your inbox.

Bibliography

Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K. (2019) Film Art: An Introduction. 12th edn. McGraw-Hill Education.

Glass, R. (2020) Saint Maud production notes. A24 Studios. Available at: https://a24films.com/notes/saint-maud (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Kael, P. (1965) ‘Repulsion’, The New Yorker, 20 February.

Polanski, R. (1984) Roman. New York: William Morrow.

Schuessler, J. (2019) ‘Saints Alive: Rose Glass on Faith and Fury’, The Guardian, 8 November. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/nov/08/saint-maud-rose-glass-interview (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Thompson, D. (1994) Polanski: The Cinema of a Cultural Traveller. London: BFI Publishing.

Williams, L. (2008) Screening Sex. Durham: Duke University Press.

Wood, R. (2003) Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan. New York: Columbia University Press.