Minds in Mayhem: Unmasking Realism in Two Psychological Nightmares

In the labyrinth of the human psyche, where does cinema most faithfully mirror the chaos of madness?

Psychological horror thrives on the terror within, pitting fragile minds against unseen demons. Two films stand as titans in this arena: Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal Psycho from 1960 and M. Night Shyamalan’s provocative Split from 2016. Both dissect dissociative identity disorder—or multiple personality disorder as it was once termed—through protagonists whose fractured selves unleash unimaginable horror. This analysis weighs their portrayals against clinical realities, exploring how each captures the essence of mental fragmentation in ways that blur the line between screen fiction and lived nightmare.

  • Hitchcock’s Psycho revolutionised horror by humanising the monster through Norman Bates’s chilling duality, setting a benchmark for psychological depth.
  • Shyamalan’s Split amplifies multiplicity with Kevin Crumb’s 23 personalities, pushing visceral realism through raw physical transformations.
  • Ultimately, Split edges ahead in clinical fidelity, though Psycho‘s subtlety endures as a cultural touchstone for inner monstrosity.

The Maternal Haunt: Unveiling Norman’s Abyss

In Psycho, the narrative pivots around Marion Crane, a secretary who steals $40,000 and flees to the remote Bates Motel. There, she encounters the affable yet eerie Norman Bates, run by his domineering mother. The infamous shower scene shatters expectations: Marion’s brutal murder by a shadowy figure cloaked in a dress marks a seismic shift in horror, thrusting viewers into voyeuristic dread. Hitchcock masterfully builds tension through rapid cuts—over 70 in under three minutes—juxtaposing slashing knife with screeching violins, a symphony of violation that lingers.

Norman’s psyche unravels gradually. His hobby of taxidermy hints at preserved innocence corrupted, while peephole voyeurism reveals a split self: the boy craving maternal approval and the mother enforcing puritanical rage. The film’s climax in the fruit cellar exposes the truth—Norman has subsumed his mother’s corpse, adopting her persona to commit atrocities. This fusion of identities predates formal DID diagnosis but echoes early psychiatric cases like those documented in the 19th century by French alienists, where trauma birthed alternate selves as survival mechanisms.

Hitchcock draws from real-life inspirations, including Ed Gein, the Wisconsin ghoul whose crimes involved grave-robbing and maternal obsession. Yet Psycho elevates this to mythic proportions, transforming personal pathology into a universal fear of the familiar turning feral. The black-and-white cinematography enhances claustrophobia, with low-angle shots dwarfing Norman against looming Victorian facades, symbolising repressed Victorian morality erupting in modern suburbia.

Themes of guilt and identity permeate: Marion’s theft mirrors Norman’s internal larceny of self. Psychoanalysts have long praised Hitchcock’s Freudian precision—Norman embodies the Oedipal complex writ large, where matricide fantasy manifests as alternate personae. This subtlety grounds the horror in emotional realism, making audiences complicit as Norman’s gaze implicates their own voyeurism.

Personalities Unleashed: Kevin’s Kaleidoscope of Chaos

Split catapults the premise into hyperdrive. Three teenage girls—Casey, Claire, and Marcia—are abducted by Kevin Wendell Crumb, a man harbouring 23 distinct personalities, or ‘the Horde’. From the childlike Hedwig to the sophisticated Patricia and the beastly ‘The Beast’ evolving at film’s end, each alter manifests physically: Kevin’s stammer dissolves into Patricia’s refined lilt, Hedwig’s limp alters gait entirely. Shyamalan films these shifts with unflinching intimacy, using close-ups on twitching muscles and shifting postures to convey somatic reality.

The plot unfolds in a labyrinthine underground lair, where Casey’s history of abuse—revealed through flashbacks to her father’s death—forges an unlikely bond with ‘the 24th’, the emerging superhuman Beast. Kevin’s diabetes flares under stress, alters ration insulin with precision only they recall, underscoring DID’s hallmark amnesia walls. Shyamalan consulted psychologists for authenticity, incorporating real symptoms like identity intrusion and sensory variances, where alters perceive colours differently or exhibit allergies absent in the host.

Visually, Split employs a muted palette interrupted by bursts of red—blood, Casey’s scars—evoking primal urges. The Beast’s final form, with scaled skin and super strength, stretches into supernatural territory, yet roots in documented DID cases where alters display disparate IQs or physical prowess, as in the infamous 1970s Sybil narrative, later contested but influential.

Shyamalan interrogates trauma’s alchemy: Casey’s molestation by her uncle parallels Kevin’s childhood beatings, birthing beasts as both defence and destroyer. This cyclical violence critiques societal neglect of mental health, positioning multiplicity not as mere madness but evolutionary adaptation—a modern myth where the mind splinters to survive.

Myths of the Multiplied Self: From Folklore to Freud

Psychological horror evolves from ancient lore. Shamans invoked spirit possession; medieval texts described demoniacs with voices not their own. The 18th-century ‘Salpêtrière hysterics’ under Charcot blurred hysteria and possession, influencing Freud’s dissociation theories. Both films tap this vein: Norman’s mother as possessing ghost, Kevin’s Horde as internal pantheon.

In evolutionary terms, DID may stem from adaptive plurality—tribal shamans switching states for healing or hunting. Psycho nods to gothic doubles like Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde, where civility conceals savagery. Split accelerates this, positing alters as specialised survival tools, akin to animal camouflage.

Cultural shifts amplify realism: 1960s Psycho shocked post-war optimism, exposing suburban rot. 2010s Split reflects fragmented digital identities, where social media personas mimic alters. Both weaponise the uncanny valley—the familiar face twisting into otherness.

Performances that Pierce the Veil

Anthony Perkins imbues Norman with tragic fragility; his boyish grin cracks into maternal menace seamlessly. Perkins drew from Method acting, starving himself for vulnerability, his wide eyes pleading complicity. Conversely, James McAvoy’s tour de force in Split demands athletic precision—23 accents, postures, from Cockney Dennis to nine-year-old Hedwig. McAvoy immersed via therapy sessions, his transformations hypnotic, blurring actor and affliction.

Supporting casts elevate: Vera Miles as Lila Crane probes psychiatric depths; Anya Taylor-Joy’s Casey conveys haunted resilience. These portrayals humanise horror, grounding spectacle in empathy.

Craft of the Unseen: Techniques of Terror

Hitchcock’s montage dissects psyche; Dutch angles warp reality. Bernard Herrmann’s score—stabbing strings sans effects—internalises dread. Shyamalan favours long takes for personality switches, West’s cinematography capturing micro-expressions. Practical makeup for the Beast—adhesives, prosthetics—rivals CGI, evoking An American Werewolf in London‘s transformations but psychologically sourced.

Sound design reigns: Psycho‘s mother’s voice echoes hollowly; Split‘s alters whisper intrusively, mimicking auditory hallucinations.

Realism Reckoned: Clinical Crucible

DID criteria per DSM-5 demand two+ identities with amnesia gaps, often trauma-linked. Psycho simplifies to binary switch, prescient but limited—no full Horde spectrum. Norman lacks overt physical changes, prioritising delusion over dissociation.

Split excels: alters control physiology (insulin, strength), echoing cases like ‘Eve White’ with ictal variances. Yet sensationalises—the Beast veers fantastical, critiqued by experts like McLean Hospital’s DID clinic for stigmatising. Still, amnesia accuracy and co-consciousness glimpses surpass Psycho‘s era constraints.

Therapeutic lens: integration therapy dissolves alters; films portray permanence, heightening tragedy. Split‘s realism wins via detail, though Psycho‘s archetype endures.

Echoes Through Eternity: Legacy’s Lasting Shadow

Psycho birthed slasher era—Friday the 13th, Halloween owe its structure. Parodies abound; Gus Van Sant’s 1998 shot-for-shot remake tests iconicity. Split spawned Glass, merging with Unbreakable‘s superhumans, evolving psych-horror into genre hybrid.

Culturally, both destigmatise? Or sensationalise? Debates rage, yet they illuminate mental health’s horrors, urging empathy amid fear.

Director in the Spotlight

Alfred Hitchcock, born 13 August 1899 in London’s East End to greengrocer William and Amelia, endured Catholic strictness shaping his precision. A childhood punishment—locked in police cells—ignited fascination with suspense. Engineering training at London County Council preceded film entry as The Daily Express caption writer, then titles designer for Paramount’s Islington Studios.

Directorial debut The Pleasure Garden (1925) starred Virginia Valli; The Lodger (1927) introduced Jack the Ripper motifs. Hollywood beckoned post-The 39 Steps (1935); Rebecca (1940) won Best Picture. Master of suspense via ‘pure cinema’—visual storytelling sans dialogue—he pioneered the dolly zoom in Vertigo (1958).

Key works: Shadow of a Doubt (1943), niece-murderer tale; Rear Window (1954), voyeuristic thriller; North by Northwest (1959), crop-duster chase icon; The Birds (1963), avian apocalypse; Marnie (1964), psychological study; Torn Curtain (1966), Cold War espionage; Topaz (1969), Cuba intrigue; Frenzy (1972), return to strangler roots; Family Plot (1976), final caper.

Married Alma Reville since 1926, father to Patricia, he influenced Spielberg, De Palma. ‘Master of Suspense’ knighthood declined; died 1980, legacy in Alfred Hitchcock Presents TV. Influences: German Expressionism, von Stroheim; style: Catholic guilt, blonde heroines as blank canvases.

Actor in the Spotlight

James McAvoy, born 21 April 1979 in Glasgow’s Scotstoun to nurse Elizabeth and builder James, endured parents’ split at seven, raised by maternal grandparents. Drama sparked at St Thomas Aquinas Secondary; Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama graduate (1997). Breakthrough: Ratcatcher (1999), then State of Play (2003) TV.

X-Men propelled stardom: X-Men: The Last Stand (2006) as young Professor X, reprised in First Class (2011), Days of Future Past (2014), Apocalypse (2016), Dark Phoenix (2019). Atonement (2007) earned BAFTA nod; The Last King of Scotland (2006) as Nicholas Garrigan mesmerised.

Versatile: Wanted (2008), assassin action; The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005) as Mr Tumnus; Filth (2013), corrupt cop; Victor Frankenstein (2015), Igor; Trainspotting 2 (2017), Renton return. Theatre: The Ruling Class (2015). Awards: BAFTA Scotland, Saturn for Split (2016), where 23 personalities showcased chameleon skill.

Married Jessica Brown Findlay (2014-17), son Brendan. Activism: mental health, Scottish independence. Influences: Daniel Day-Lewis; married to body transformation for roles.

Ready for Deeper Nightmares?

Subscribe to HORROTICA for exclusive dives into horror’s darkest corners. Your next shiver awaits.

Bibliography

Rebello, S. (1990) Alfred Hitchcock and the Making of Psycho. Berkley Books.

Spoto, D. (1983) The Dark Side of Genius: The Life of Alfred Hitchcock. Little, Brown and Company.

Durgnat, R. (1967) A Long Hard Look at Psycho. The Traction Engine Press.

Brand, B. L. et al. (2009) ‘A 2-year follow-up study’, Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(4), pp. 284-297. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0017525 (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

Shyamalan, M. N. (2017) ‘Interview: On Split and Superpowers of the Mind’, Collider. Available at: https://collider.com/split-movie-m-night-shyamalan-interview/ (Accessed: 15 October 2023).

McAvoy, J. (2016) ‘Preparation for Split’, Empire Magazine, March issue.

Hacking, I. (1995) Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton University Press.

Levy, L. (2018) ‘Dissociative Identity Disorder in Cinema: Split and Beyond’, Journal of Popular Culture, 51(2), pp. 456-478. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpcu.12645 (Accessed: 15 October 2023).