Two solitary women, besieged by their own unraveling psyches, expose the raw terror of the mind turned inward.

 

In the shadowed corridors of psychological horror, few films capture the insidious creep of mental disintegration as potently as Roman Polanski’s Repulsion (1965) and Rose Glass’s Saint Maud (2019). These works, separated by over half a century, dissect the female psyche under isolation, blending visceral unease with profound thematic resonance. This comparison uncovers their shared descent into madness, stylistic innovations, and enduring chills.

 

  • Both films weaponise solitude to amplify internal horrors, transforming domestic spaces into nightmarish prisons.
  • Repression—sexual in Repulsion, religious in Saint Maud—fuels protagonists’ hallucinatory spirals, mirroring broader societal taboos.
  • Through masterful cinematography and sound design, they redefine psychological terror, influencing generations of filmmakers.

 

The Crumbling Sanctuaries of the Soul

At the heart of Repulsion lies Carol Ledoux, portrayed with ethereal fragility by Catherine Deneuve. A Belgian manicurist in swinging London, Carol inhabits a pristine yet suffocating apartment shared with her sister Hélène. As Hélène departs for a holiday with her lover, Carol’s fragile equilibrium shatters. The film unfolds over six days of escalating delusion: walls pulse and crack, hands emerge from shadows to grope her body, and the apartment decays into a fetid mausoleum of rabbit carcasses and bricked-up doorways. Polanski’s camera lingers on minutiae—the tap’s relentless drip, a man’s silhouette on the stairs—building a symphony of dread from the mundane. Carol’s violence erupts against intruders, first her landlord, then a suitor, her acts framed not as empowerment but as tragic reflexes of a mind recoiling from intimacy.

Saint Maud, by contrast, transplants this isolation to a decaying coastal English town. Maud, a devout nurse played by Morfydd Clark, tends to her terminally ill patient, Amanda Köhler, a once-celebrated dancer. Maud’s zeal morphs into fanaticism; she believes God has anointed her to save Amanda’s soul. Flashbacks reveal Maud’s past as Katie, scarred by a car accident and a patient’s death, prompting her religious rebirth. Her private rituals escalate—self-flagellation, walking on coals—until reality frays. Amanda’s mocking rejection precipitates Maud’s final, blasphemous act, blurring martyrdom with murder in a climax of fire and blood. Glass’s narrative arcs from quiet caregiving to ecstatic visions, the house itself a vessel for Maud’s masochistic piety.

Both synopses eschew jump scares for inexorable psychological erosion. In Repulsion, Carol’s catatonia manifests in long, static takes of her wandering the apartment, her blank stares conveying a soul adrift. Saint Maud mirrors this with Maud’s fervent prayers, her face contorted in rapture or agony. Production histories enrich these tales: Polanski shot Repulsion on a shoestring budget in a real London flat, amplifying authenticity, while Glass’s debut drew from her nursing observations, infusing Saint Maud with lived intimacy. Myths underpin both—Repulsion nods to Freudian hysteria, Saint Maud to Catholic saint lore—yet they forge original nightmares from universal fears.

Key ensembles amplify the solipsism: In Repulsion, Ian Hendry’s persistent suitor and Yvonne Furneaux’s sensual sister contrast Carol’s frigidity, their intrusions catalysing her breakdown. Saint Maud features Jennifer Ehle as the sardonic Amanda, whose atheism clashes with Maud’s fervour, and a circle of hedonistic housemates underscoring Maud’s alienation. Crew standouts include Gilbert Taylor’s stark black-and-white cinematography in Repulsion, evoking film noir dread, and Glass’s collaboration with Ben Fordesman on Saint Maud‘s A24 polish, blending gritty realism with surreal flourishes.

Repression’s Venomous Bloom

Sexual aversion poisons Carol’s world in Repulsion, her trauma hinted at through fragmented flashbacks—a priest’s leering gaze, family tensions—culminating in hallucinatory rapes that symbolise patriarchal violation. Polanski probes 1960s sexual liberation’s underbelly: amid London’s mod excess, Carol embodies the virgin/whore dichotomy, her beauty a curse. Her murders reclaim agency, yet end in catatonic defeat, critiquing therapy’s impotence as her psychiatrist merely observes the corpse-strewn flat.

Maud’s repression in Saint Maud channels religious ecstasy, her body a canvas for divine punishment. Glass intertwines masochism with autoeroticism—nailed feet, scalded soles—evoking saintly ecstasies while subverting them into horror. Maud’s past as promiscuous Katie fuels her purification quest, paralleling Carol’s flight from desire. Both films indict institutional failures: the Church ignores Maud’s zealotry, mirroring the medical establishment’s neglect of Carol.

Class undercurrents sharpen the comparison. Carol’s bourgeois stasis clashes with her working-class job, her sister’s affair a bourgeois indulgence she resents. Maud, from humble origins, elevates herself through faith, despising Amanda’s artistic privilege. These dynamics expose how madness festers in societal margins, a theme resonant across eras.

Gender politics further bind them. Carol and Maud defy male gazes—Deneuve’s impassive allure repels advances, Clark’s fervent gaze pierces judgmentally—yet their fates affirm female hysteria tropes. Polanski and Glass, both outsiders (Polish émigré, queer British filmmaker), infuse empathy, transforming victimhood into complex tragedy.

Visions from the Abyss: Cinematic Nightmares

Polanski’s mise-en-scène in Repulsion turns the apartment into a living entity: walls bruise and soften, potatoes sprout eyes, mirrors multiply Carol’s fractured self. Close-ups on her pores, eyes dilating in terror, immerse viewers in her subjectivity. The film’s 35mm black-and-white grain evokes celluloid decay, aligning form with content.

Glass employs colour in Saint Maud for visceral impact: Maud’s crimson stigmata against pallid skin, fire’s orange glow consuming the finale. Subjective shots—through nail-pierced feet, inverted crucifixion—distort perspective, echoing Repulsion‘s hallway elongations. Both directors favour shallow focus, isolating protagonists amid encroaching chaos.

Iconic scenes demand dissection. Carol’s first hallucination—a man’s face superimposed on wallpaper—announces unreality, technique refined from Polanski’s shorts. Maud’s beach dance, bodies writhing in slow-motion frenzy, fuses religious trance with body horror, rivaling Repulsion‘s rabbit-rot sequence for repulsion.

Effects innovate modestly yet potently. Repulsion uses practical prosthetics for groping hands, no CGI needed; Saint Maud blends makeup (blistered feet) with digital enhancements for visions, bridging analog grit and modern polish.

Echoes of Madness: Sound and Fury

Chakachas’ sultry lounge track in Repulsion underscores Carol’s alienation, its brass swells mocking her tension. Ambient horrors dominate: heartbeat thuds, scraping walls, Bronisław Kaper’s score minimal to let silence scream. This soundscape prefigures irréversible extremes.

Saint Maud‘s score by Adam Janicki throbs with choral swells and dissonant strings, Maud’s prayers distorted into whispers. Everyday noises—creaking stairs, vomiting—amplify unease, akin to Repulsion‘s drip. Both films master acousmêtre, off-screen threats manifesting as sonic phantoms.

Class politics seep through audio: Repulsion‘s posh accents grate against Carol’s silence; Saint Maud‘s hymnals clash with Amanda’s jazz. Sound design elevates isolation, proving auditory terror timeless.

Haunting Incarnations: Performances that Linger

Deneuve’s Carol mesmerises through stillness, her minimal dialogue conveying depths Polanski drew from her real shyness. Clark’s Maud erupts in physicality—convulsing in prayer, sprinting through rain—her Welsh intensity grounding zealotry. Both vanish into roles, earning BAFTA nods.

Supporting turns elevate: Hendry’s oily persistence, Ehle’s wry despair. These foils humanise the madwomen, preventing caricature.

Enduring Shadows: Legacy and Influence

Repulsion birthed apartment horror, inspiring Rosemary’s Baby and Hereditary. Saint Maud revitalises faith-based dread, echoing The VVitch. Together, they anchor psychological horror’s canon, proving the mind’s abyss eternal.

Production lore fascinates: Polanski’s Holocaust survival shaped Repulsion‘s paranoia; Glass’s script won awards pre-production. Censorship dogged both—Repulsion trimmed violence, Saint Maud evaded blasphemy cuts.

In subgenre evolution, they bridge Hammer gothic to A24 ascension, emphasising female-centric terror amid male-dominated slashers.

Director in the Spotlight

Roman Polanski, born Rajmund Roman Liebling Polański on 18 August 1933 in Paris to Polish-Jewish parents, endured unimaginable trauma during World War II. His family relocated to Kraków, Poland, where at age eight, he survived the Holocaust by fleeing the Kraków Ghetto, living off wits amid Nazi occupation. Orphaned young—his mother perished in Auschwitz—Polanski honed resilience, later attending the Łódź Film School, a cradle for Polish New Wave talents like Andrzej Wajda.

His directorial debut, Knife in the Water (1962), a tense yacht-set thriller, garnered international acclaim and an Oscar nomination, launching his English-language career. Repulsion (1965) followed, cementing his horror mastery. Rosemary’s Baby (1968) blended paranoia with Satanism, earning cult status. The 1970s brought Macbeth (1971), a bloody Shakespeare adaptation; Chinatown (1974), a neo-noir pinnacle scripted by Robert Towne; and Tess (1979), a lavish Hardy adaptation inspired by his late wife Sharon Tate.

Personal scandals marked his path: fleeing US sodomy charges in 1978, he settled in France, directing Pirates (1986), Frantic (1988) with Harrison Ford, and Bitter Moon (1992), an erotic thriller. Later works include The Ninth Gate (1999) with Johnny Depp, The Pianist (2002)—his Holocaust semi-autobiography, winning three Oscars including Best Director—and The Ghost Writer (2010), a political intrigue. Venus in Fur (2013) and Based on a True Story (2017) showcase his theatre roots. Influences span Hitchcock and Buñuel; his style—claustrophobia, moral ambiguity—defines auteur horror.

Polanski’s filmography spans 20+ features: Two Men and a Wardrobe (1958, short); Watermelon (1961, short); Cul-de-sac (1966); Dance of the Vampires (1967); A Day at the Beach (unreleased, 1970); What? (1972); The Tenant (1976, his Apartment Trilogy capstone); Strange Magic (documentary, 2001). Awards abound: Venice Golden Lion for The Pianist, César Lifetime Achievement. Controversies aside, his oeuvre endures as cinema’s provocative force.

Actor in the Spotlight

Catherine Deneuve, born Catherine Dorléac on 22 October 1943 in Paris, France, into a theatrical dynasty—her parents actors, sisters Françoise Dorléac and Sylvie—embarked on child modelling before teen stardom. Jacques Demy’s The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964) catapulted her globally, her porcelain beauty and enigmatic poise defining the icône archetype.

Repulsion (1965) marked her horror ingress, her paralysed intensity earning acclaim. Belle de Jour (1967, Buñuel) blended bourgeois housewife with prostitute fantasy, Cannes Best Actress. Tristana (1970, Buñuel again) and Donkey Skin (1970, Demy) showcased versatility. The 1970s: The Last Metro (1980, Truffaut) César win; Indochine (1992) Oscar nomination.

Her oeuvre exceeds 120 films: Les Demoiselles de Rochefort (1967, Demy musical); Manon 70 (1969); Mayerling (1968 TV); Hustle (1975, Pollack); The Hunger (1983, vampire eroticism); Damage (1992); Persepolis (2007, voice); The Truth (2019, Kore-eda). Awards: Cannes (1967, 1998), César (1981, 1995, 2005), Honorary Oscar (2024? pending). Influences: Bardot’s sensuality tempered by introspection. Personal life: mother to Chiara Mastroianni (Depardieu), activist for women’s rights. Deneuve remains cinema’s eternal muse.

 

Craving more dives into horror’s depths? Subscribe to NecroTimes for exclusive analyses and unearth the next nightmare.

Bibliography

Bradshaw, P. (2021) Saint Maud review – shiveringly good Rose Glass debut. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/feb/19/saint-maud-review-shiveringly-good-rose-glass-debut (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Ebert, R. (1965) Repulsion. RogerEbert.com. Available at: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/repulsion-1965 (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

French, P. (2009) Polanski: The Cinema of a Cultural Traveller. Manchester University Press.

Glass, R. (2020) Saint Maud: Director’s Commentary. A24 Blu-ray Edition.

Kael, P. (1965) Repulsion. The New Yorker, 11 December.

Polanski, R. (1984) Roman. William Morrow.

Romney, J. (2019) Saint Maud: Rose Glass on her infernal debut. Sight & Sound. Available at: https://www.bfi.org.uk/sight-and-sound/features/saint-maud-rose-glass-interview (Accessed: 15 October 2024).

Tabuenca, J. (2015) Catherine Deneuve: An Actress in 50 Films. Festival de Cine de San Sebastián.

Vincendeau, G. (2000) Stars and Stardom in French Cinema. Continuum.

White, M. (1995) Roman Polanski: Prophecy and Sorrow. Schirmer Books.