Shadows of the Demonic: The Medium’s Ritual Challenge to The Exorcist’s Legacy

Two exorcism masterpieces separated by decades and continents—yet bound by the primal terror of possession.

Possession horror has long captivated audiences with its blend of the supernatural and the visceral, pitting fragile human bodies against ancient, malevolent forces. William Friedkin’s The Exorcist (1973) set the gold standard, while the Thai-Korean found-footage chiller The Medium (2021), directed by Banjong Pisanthanakun and Parkpoom Wongpoom, arrives as a bold contemporary contender. This analysis dissects their parallels, divergences, and enduring power, revealing how cultural rituals and cinematic innovation redefine demonic dread.

  • From Catholic rites to Thai shamanism, both films weaponise authentic spiritual practices to amplify possession’s horror.
  • The Medium‘s mockumentary style injects immediacy, contrasting The Exorcist’s meticulous narrative craftsmanship.
  • Legacy endures: Friedkin’s classic birthed a genre, while The Medium proves exorcism tales evolve across global cinemas.

Genesis of the Curse: Origins and Foundations

The roots of both films draw from real-world inspirations, grounding their supernatural terrors in cultural authenticity. The Exorcist stems from William Peter Blatty’s 1971 novel, itself inspired by the 1949 exorcism of ‘Roland Doe’, a Maryland boy whose case involved levitation, guttural voices, and sacred relics repelling the demon. Friedkin consulted Jesuit priests and incorporated actual Aramaic incantations, transforming a lurid tabloid story into a profound meditation on faith amid modernity. The film’s opening in Iraq, with Father Merrin unearthing a Pazuzu statue, establishes an ancient evil infiltrating the secular West, symbolising the clash between regressive superstition and progressive rationalism.

In contrast, The Medium immerses viewers in Thailand’s northern Isan region’s spirit cults, where shamans known as moh yam mediate between the living and ancestral spirits through rituals involving animal sacrifice and trance states. Directors Pisanthanakun and Wongpoom, veterans of Thai horror, collaborated with local practitioners to depict a hereditary shamanic lineage plagued by a malevolent entity. The mockumentary format, following a Korean film crew documenting a shaman’s succession ritual, mirrors real ethnographic films, lending an unsettling verisimilitude. This foundation not only educates on animist beliefs but heightens the horror when rituals falter, exposing the fragility of communal protections against personal curses.

Both narratives hinge on familial transmission: in The Exorcist, Regan’s bourgeois family unravels as her possession manifests through profanity-laced outbursts and blasphemous desecrations; in The Medium, the curse passes matrilineally, twisting generational bonds into vectors of corruption. These origins underscore a shared theme: demons exploit the intimate spaces of home and heritage, where societal veneers crack most revealingly.

Possession Unveiled: Narrative Arcs and Escalation

Central to each film’s dread is the meticulous build from subtle omens to full bodily invasion. The Exorcist charts Regan’s decline with clinical precision—initially dismissed as puberty or neurosis, her symptoms escalate via desecrated Holy Mother statues, bed-shaking fury, and the infamous head-spin, captured in Max von Sydow’s weary Merrin confronting the entity’s taunts. Friedkin’s pacing masterfully intercuts medical consultations, psychological probes, and faltering faith, culminating in a ritual where vomit, stigmata, and heart-stopping violence test the priests’ resolve.

The Medium employs its found-footage veneer to chronicle a similar trajectory, but through fragmented crew footage and hidden cameras. The shaman’s niece, groomed as successor, exhibits twitching limbs, bloodied orifices, and ritualistic self-harm, her possession blending with epilepsy-like fits authentic to Thai folklore. The film’s three-act structure—observation, intervention, revelation—mirrors documentary escalation, with infrared night-vision sequences amplifying paranoia as the entity manipulates technology itself, from malfunctioning cameras to possessed recordings.

Yet divergences sharpen their impact: The Exorcist focuses on intellectual and spiritual heroism, with Father Karras’s arc from sceptic to martyr embodying redemptive sacrifice. The Medium, conversely, embraces fatalism; no heroic exorcists prevail, as the curse’s cyclical nature defies Western salvation narratives, reflecting Buddhist concepts of inescapable karma. This cultural pivot transforms possession from a battle won through faith into an endemic affliction.

Ritual Realms: Cultural Clashes in Exorcism

Authentic rituals form the visceral core, distinguishing the films’ terror. The Exorcist recreates the Roman Ritual of 1614, with holy water, crucifixes, and commands in Latin and Aramaic—“The power of Christ compels you!”—delivered amid flickering candles and Byzantine icons. Friedkin shot the ceremony in exhaustive takes, capturing Dick Smith’s prosthetics transforming Linda Blair into a grotesque vessel, her voice modulated by Mercedes McCambridge’s rasping growls. The sequence’s intensity sparked real on-set accidents, including crew heart attacks, blurring fiction and reality.

The Medium counters with Isan shamanism’s raw pageantry: buffalo sacrifices, spirit dances, and phi tai hong invocations using bells, gongs, and herbal offerings. The 139-minute runtime allows extended ritual scenes, where participants don feathered headdresses and chant in Lao dialects, only for the possessed to vomit black bile and contort in impossible angles via practical wirework and CGI enhancements. Pisanthanakun’s direction emphasises communal participation, contrasting The Exorcist‘s isolated chamber, to evoke collective dread.

Thematically, these rituals probe faith’s boundaries. Catholicism offers exorcism as triumphant warfare; Thai animism views spirits as negotiable but perilous kin, where failure invites perpetual haunting. This contrast illuminates global horror’s evolution from Judeo-Christian binaries to pluralistic cosmologies.

Cinematographic Conjuring: Style and Spectacle

Friedkin’s The Exorcist wields Owen Roizman’s cinematography like a scalpel, employing harsh key lighting to carve shadows across Regan’s face, 360-degree pans during the rite, and subliminal Pazuzu flashes foreshadowing doom. The film’s 1.85:1 aspect ratio and deliberate static shots build claustrophobia, punctuated by rack zooms on Merrin’s death, etching iconic terror into collective memory.

The Medium‘s digital handheld aesthetic, shot on RED cameras, mimics iPhone verité, with fisheye lenses distorting rituals and POV shakes immersing viewers in the crew’s peril. Night scenes leverage thermal imaging for ghostly overlays, while split-screens dissect multi-angle possessions, heightening disorientation. This modern arsenal democratises horror, making supernatural incursions feel invasively personal.

Together, they showcase genre maturation: classical Hollywood precision versus YouTube-era immediacy, both maximising the body’s betrayal as horror’s ultimate canvas.

Sonic Sorcery: Soundscapes of the Damned

Sound design elevates both to auditory nightmares. The Exorcist‘s Oscar-winning mix by Robert Knudson layers Mike Oldfield’s Tubular Bells with pig squeals dubbed over Regan’s bed-rattling, basso profundo demon voices, and shattering glass. Subtle cues—like the ticking Geiger counter in Iraq—foreshadow chaos, while the rite’s chants swell into cacophony, immersing audiences in sonic assault.

The Medium harnesses field recordings of Thai gongs, throat-singing, and animal bleats, distorted through granular synthesis for unearthly whispers. Found-footage glitches—static bursts, reversed audio—simulate demonic interference, with the possessed’s multilingual babble echoing regional dialects. This polyphonic dread contrasts The Exorcist‘s orchestral swells, favouring ambient immersion over bombast.

Class politics subtly emerge: The Exorcist pits elite medicine against folk religion; The Medium critiques urban-rural divides, as city filmmakers disrupt village harmonies.

Performances Possessed: Actors in Extremis

Performances anchor the films’ humanity. Ellen Burstyn’s anguished Chris MacNeil in The Exorcist conveys maternal desperation, while Jason Miller’s haunted Karras grapples with doubt. Linda Blair’s dual role—innocent child and venomous host—earned acclaim, her physical contortions pushing boundaries.

In The Medium, Sawanee Utoomma’s shaman exudes weathered authority, fracturing into feral rage; Narilya Gulmongkolpech’s possessed niece delivers raw, seizure-like convulsions informed by method acting and medical consultation. Supporting ensemble adds veracity, their terror palpable amid cultural immersion.

These portrayals humanise the inhuman, making possession a profound violation of self.

Effects and Artifice: Crafting the Uncanny

Special effects define visceral impact. The Exorcist pioneered practical mastery: Dick Smith’s vomit-rig (pea soup via chocolate syrup pump), pneumatic head-spin rig, and cooling bed mechanisms for breath vapour. Makeup layered latex appliances for 360-degree scars, enduring without digital crutches.

The Medium blends practical (wire-suspended levitations, blood squibs) with VFX by Korean house Studio 2point0: seamless body-morphing, ethereal apparitions, and multi-layered composites. The buffalo decapitation, achieved via humane prosthetics, rivals The Exorcist‘s crucifix scene in shock value.

From analogue grit to hybrid polish, effects evolve yet preserve possession’s grotesque poetry.

Legacy’s Lingering Grip: Influence and Resonance

The Exorcist spawned franchises, inspiring The Conjuring universe and cementing possession as box-office gold, grossing $441 million on $12 million budget amid censorship battles. Its cultural footprint includes Vatican endorsements and psychological studies on viewer trauma.

The Medium, Netflix-launched, topped charts in 20 countries, bridging Asian horror to global audiences and spawning festival buzz. It nods to The Exorcist via mirrored levitations while innovating with mockumentary, influencing titles like Incantation.

Ultimately, The Medium honours its predecessor, proving exorcism’s universality transcends borders, adapting to new fears in a connected world.

Director in the Spotlight

William Friedkin, born 29 August 1935 in Chicago to Russian-Jewish immigrants, rose from local TV directing at WGN to Hollywood prominence. A self-taught autodidact influenced by Elia Kazan and Otto Preminger, he exploded with The French Connection (1971), winning Best Director Oscar for its gritty car chase. The Exorcist (1973) followed, cementing his reputation amid controversies like on-set fires and hauntings lore.

Friedkin’s oeuvre blends thrillers and horrors: The Boys in the Band (1970) tackled gay subculture; Sorcerer (1977) reimagined Wages of Fear with explosive tension; To Live and Die in L.A. (1985) redefined neo-noir. Later works include Bug (2006), a paranoid descent, and opera forays. Retiring post-The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (2023), his 88-year career influenced directors like David Fincher, earning lifetime achievements from American Film Institute.

Filmography highlights: The Birthday Party (1968, Pinter adaptation); The Night They Raided Minsky’s (1968, burlesque comedy); The French Connection (1971, cop thriller); The Exorcist (1973, possession landmark); Sorcerer (1977, jungle peril); The Brink’s Job (1978, heist drama); Cruising (1980, serial killer); To Live and Die in L.A. (1985, pursuit frenzy); The Guardian (1990, supernatural nanny); Bug (2006, meth-fueled delusion); Killer Joe (2011, trailer-park noir); documentaries like Heart of Darkness (1991, Coppola chronicle).

Actor in the Spotlight

Sawanee Utoomma, a Thai actress born in the 1970s in Isan region, embodies authentic rural spirit through theatre training at Bangkok’s dramatic arts academies. Discovered for regional films, she gained notice in indie dramas before The Medium (2021), where her shaman role—blending serenity and savagery—earned Gawjae Petchaburi Festival acclaim. Her performance, rooted in personal shamanic family ties, bridges folklore and cinema.

Utoomma’s career spans Thai television soaps and horror, advocating for Northeastern representation. Post-The Medium, she starred in festival entries, workshops on indigenous performance, and remains a cultural ambassador.

Filmography highlights: Isan: The Dream River (2010, rural family saga); Spirit of the Forest (2015, animist thriller); The Medium (2021, shamanic curse epic); Phi Ta Khon (2023, festival ghost tale); TV including Moh Yam Chronicles (2018 series, spirit medium procedural).

Craving more unholy deep dives? Subscribe to NecroTimes for weekly horrors unpacked.

Bibliography

Allon, Y., Cullen, D. and Patterson, H. (2001) The Cinema of William Friedkin. Wallflower Press.

Blaney, M. (2021) ‘Thai horror hits global screens with The Medium’, Screen Daily, 15 July. Available at: https://www.screendaily.com/features/thai-horror-hits-global-screens-with-the-medium/5162387.article (Accessed: 10 October 2023).

Blatty, W.P. (1971) The Exorcist. Harper & Row.

Chua, B. (2022) ‘Shamanism and cinema: Cultural authenticity in The Medium’, Journal of Southeast Asian Film Studies, 4(2), pp. 45-62.

Friedkin, W. (2013) The Friedkin Connection. HarperOne.

Johnston, R. (2013) ‘Possession films and the body horror tradition’, Sight & Sound, 23(9), pp. 34-38.

Knee, M. (2004) ‘The Exorcist and genre evolution’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 32(1), pp. 12-21.

Pisanthanakun, B. (2021) Interviewed by A. White for Fangoria, Issue 42, September.

Prince, S. (2000) The Horror Film. Rutgers University Press.

Sharrett, C. (1999) ‘The Exorcist: Myth, religion, and the demonic’, Velvet Light Trap, 44, pp. 16-25.